Suppr超能文献

在一项针对临床实践的5年观察性研究中,接受传统全身性药物和生物制剂的银屑病患者发生不良事件的风险:2008 - 2013年Biobadaderm注册研究结果

Risk of adverse events in psoriasis patients receiving classic systemic drugs and biologics in a 5-year observational study of clinical practice: 2008-2013 results of the Biobadaderm registry.

作者信息

Carretero G, Ferrandiz C, Dauden E, Vanaclocha Sebastián F, Gómez-García F J, Herrera-Ceballos E, De la Cueva-Dobao P, Belinchón I, Sánchez-Carazo J L, Alsina-Gibert M, López-Estebaranz J L, Ferrán M, Torrado R, Carrascosa J M, Carazo C, Rivera R, Jiménez-Puya R, García-Doval I

机构信息

Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jan;29(1):156-63. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12492. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biobadaderm is the Spanish registry of psoriasis patients receiving systemic treatment in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety of biologics and classic systemic treatment.

METHODS

Prospective cohort of patients receiving biologics and classic systemic therapies between 2008 and 2013 in 12 hospitals are included. We registered demographic data, diagnoses, comorbidities, treatments and adverse events (AE). We obtained raw relative risks (RR) for specific AE. Multivariate analysis consisted of Cox models adjusting for age, gender, chronic hepatic disease and previous cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 1030 patients received biologics (2061 AE in 3681 person-years), 926 patients classic systemic drugs (1015 AE in 1517 person-years). Ninety-three per cent of AE in both groups were non-serious, 6% serious and 0.003% fatal. The age- and gender-adjusted hazard ratio of AE was lower in the biologics group [hazard ratio 0.6 (95% CI: 0.5-0.7)].We found no differences in rates of serious and mortal AE. Some system organ class AE rates differed between both groups. As limitations: Prescription bias might affect the incidence of AE in both groups. Association of drug and AE was based on timing: associations might not be causal.

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving biologics had lower risk of AE. We did not find differences in the risk of serious or fatal AE.

摘要

背景

Biobadaderm是西班牙在临床实践中接受系统治疗的银屑病患者登记处。

目的

比较生物制剂和传统系统治疗的安全性。

方法

纳入2008年至2013年期间在12家医院接受生物制剂和传统系统治疗的患者前瞻性队列。我们记录了人口统计学数据、诊断、合并症、治疗和不良事件(AE)。我们获得了特定AE的原始相对风险(RR)。多变量分析包括调整年龄、性别、慢性肝病和既往癌症的Cox模型。

结果

共有1030名患者接受生物制剂治疗(3681人年中发生2061例AE),926名患者接受传统系统药物治疗(1517人年中发生1015例AE)。两组中93%的AE为非严重事件,6%为严重事件,0.003%为致命事件。生物制剂组经年龄和性别调整后的AE风险比更低[风险比0.6(95%CI:0.5 - 0.7)]。我们发现严重和致命AE的发生率没有差异。两组之间某些系统器官类AE的发生率有所不同。局限性在于:处方偏倚可能影响两组AE的发生率。药物与AE的关联基于时间:关联可能不是因果关系。

结论

接受生物制剂治疗的患者AE风险较低。我们未发现严重或致命AE风险存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验