Division of Infectious Disease, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centre, Boston, MA, USA McGill International TB Centre, and Dept of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
McGill International TB Centre, and Dept of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Eur Respir J. 2014 Aug;44(2):435-46. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00007814. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is endorsed for the detection of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of Xpert for the detection of extrapulmonary TB. We searched multiple databases to October 15, 2013. We determined the accuracy of Xpert compared with culture and a composite reference standard (CRS). We grouped data by sample type and performed meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model. We assessed sources of heterogeneity using meta-regression for predefined covariates. We identified 18 studies involving 4461 samples. Sample processing varied greatly among the studies. Xpert sensitivity differed substantially between sample types. In lymph node tissues or aspirates, Xpert pooled sensitivity was 83.1% (95% CI 71.4-90.7%) versus culture and 81.2% (95% CI 72.4-87.7%) versus CRS. In cerebrospinal fluid, Xpert pooled sensitivity was 80.5% (95% CI 59.0-92.2%) against culture and 62.8% (95% CI 47.7-75.8%) against CRS. In pleural fluid, pooled sensitivity was 46.4% (95% CI 26.3-67.8%) against culture and 21.4% (95% CI 8.8-33.9%) against CRS. Xpert pooled specificity was consistently >98.7% against CRS across different sample types. Based on this systematic review, the World Health Organization now recommends Xpert over conventional tests for diagnosis of TB in lymph nodes and other tissues, and as the preferred initial test for diagnosis of TB meningitis.
Xpert MTB/RIF(Cepheid,加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔)被推荐用于检测肺结核(TB)。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估 Xpert 在检测肺外结核病方面的准确性。我们搜索了多个数据库,截至 2013 年 10 月 15 日。我们确定了 Xpert 与培养和综合参考标准(CRS)相比的准确性。我们按样本类型分组,并使用双变量随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。我们使用元回归分析了预定协变量的异质性来源。我们确定了 18 项涉及 4461 个样本的研究。研究之间的样本处理差异很大。Xpert 的灵敏度在不同样本类型之间有很大差异。在淋巴结组织或抽吸物中,Xpert 的 pooled 灵敏度为 83.1%(95%CI 71.4-90.7%),与培养相比为 81.2%(95%CI 72.4-87.7%),与 CRS 相比为 81.2%(95%CI 72.4-87.7%)。在脑脊液中,Xpert 的 pooled 灵敏度为 80.5%(95%CI 59.0-92.2%),与培养相比为 62.8%(95%CI 47.7-75.8%),与 CRS 相比为 62.8%(95%CI 47.7-75.8%)。在胸腔积液中,与培养相比,pooled 灵敏度为 46.4%(95%CI 26.3-67.8%),与 CRS 相比为 21.4%(95%CI 8.8-33.9%)。Xpert 的 pooled 特异性在不同的样本类型中始终>98.7%,与 CRS 相比。基于这项系统评价,世界卫生组织现在建议在检测淋巴结和其他组织中的结核病时,使用 Xpert 替代常规检测,并且作为诊断结核性脑膜炎的首选初始检测。