Suppr超能文献

压痛敏感性作为原发性乳腺癌女性压力的标志物及压痛敏感性引导下的压力管理

Pressure pain sensitivity as a marker for stress and pressure pain sensitivity-guided stress management in women with primary breast cancer.

作者信息

Axelsson Christen K, Ballegaard Søren, Karpatschof Benny, Schousen Peer

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, University of Copenhagen , Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2014 Aug;74(5):399-407. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.900187. Epub 2014 Apr 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To validate (1) Pressure Pain Sensitivity (PPS) as a marker for stress and (2) a PPS-guided intervention in women with primary Breast Cancer (BC).

METHODS

(1) A total of 58 women with BC were examined before and after 6 months of intervention. A control group of 165 women office employees was divided in a High Stress Group (HSG, n = 37) and a Low Stress Group (LSG, n = 128) to evaluate the association between PPS, questionnaire-related Quality of Life (QOL) and self-evaluated stress. (2) A PPS-guided stress management program (n = 40) was compared to a Psychosocial Group Intervention (PGI, n = 91) and no treatment (n = 86) with respect to a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire measured QOL.

RESULTS

(1) Resting PPS and changes in PPS during the intervention period correlated significantly to EORTC and Short Form 36 (SF 36) main scores: (all p < 0.05). Between BC, HSG and LSG there was a significant and positive correlation with respect to PPS, SF 36 main scores, depression, and clinical stress scores (all p < 0.05). However, the BC group scored significantly lower than both HSG and LSG (both p < 0.05) with respect to self-evaluated stress. (2) The PPS-guided intervention group improved EORTC main score, pain and nausea, when compared to the control groups (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PPS was positively associated with QOL, which was in contrast to self-evaluated stress. PPS-guided intervention improved QOL in women with breast cancer.

摘要

目的

验证(1)压力疼痛敏感性(PPS)作为应激标志物,以及(2)PPS指导的干预措施对原发性乳腺癌(BC)女性的效果。

方法

(1)共对58例BC女性在干预6个月前后进行检查。将165名女性办公室职员组成的对照组分为高压力组(HSG,n = 37)和低压力组(LSG,n = 128),以评估PPS、问卷相关生活质量(QOL)和自我评估应激之间的关联。(2)就欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)问卷测量的QOL而言,将PPS指导的压力管理项目(n = 40)与心理社会群体干预(PGI,n = 91)及不治疗组(n = 86)进行比较。

结果

(1)静息PPS及干预期间PPS的变化与EORTC和简明健康状况调查量表(SF - 36)主要评分显著相关(均p < 0.05)。在BC组、HSG组和LSG组之间,PPS、SF - 36主要评分、抑郁和临床应激评分存在显著正相关(均p < 0.05)。然而,BC组在自我评估应激方面的得分显著低于HSG组和LSG组(均p < 0.05)。(2)与对照组相比,PPS指导的干预组EORTC主要评分、疼痛和恶心症状有所改善(均p < 0.05)。

结论

PPS与QOL呈正相关,这与自我评估应激情况相反。PPS指导的干预改善了乳腺癌女性的QOL。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验