Kenyatta National Hospital.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Mar 6;15(2):4555. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4555.
The purpose of this study was to assess the level of patient radiation dose received in general fluoroscopy examinations, compare the findings with the international diagnostic reference levels (IDRLs), and establish the initial institutional (local) LDRLs. A comprehensive survey was conducted for general fluoroscopy examinations using the medical records of a Radiology Department of a leading regional hospital over a period close to one year. The cumulative reference point air kerma (K(a,r)), kerma area product (KAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were recorded for six hundred and fifty (30% pediatric and 70% adult) patients undergoing routine fluoroscopy examinations using X-ray equipment with built-in integrated dose measuring system. Results which were obtained for adult general fluoroscopy indicated that 83% and 33% were below the IDRLs for KAP and fluoroscopy time, respectively. In children, 60% were found to be below the only available KAP diagnostic reference levels. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) have been proposed with respect to the missing DRLs for the K(a,r), KAP, and fluoroscopy time. The majority of the examinations in the study were performed with longer fluoroscopy time, patient dose values per examination type were found to be broad and the mean values above the international diagnostic reference levels. This calls for proper and improved training and radiation protection skills for the responsible personnel, especially the equipment operators.
本研究旨在评估普通透视检查中患者所接受的辐射剂量水平,将检查结果与国际诊断参考水平(IDRL)进行比较,并建立初始的机构(本地)低剂量参考水平(LDRL)。我们对一家领先地区医院放射科的医疗记录进行了为期近一年的全面调查,对普通透视检查进行了研究。对 650 名(30%为儿科患者,70%为成年患者)接受常规透视检查的患者进行了研究,这些患者使用了内置集成剂量测量系统的 X 射线设备。结果表明,对于成年普通透视检查,83%的患者的 KAP 和 33%的患者的透视时间低于 IDRL。在儿童中,仅有的 KAP 诊断参考水平可用,有 60%的患者低于这一水平。对于 K(a,r)、KAP 和透视时间的缺失 DRL,我们提出了本地诊断参考水平(LDRL)。研究中的大多数检查都是在更长的透视时间下进行的,每个检查类型的患者剂量值都很广泛,平均值高于国际诊断参考水平。这就需要对负责人员,特别是设备操作人员进行适当的和改进的培训以及辐射防护技能培训。