Gu Suicheng, Leader Joseph, Zheng Bin, Chen Qihang, Sciurba Frank, Kminski Naftali, Gur David, Pu Jiantao
Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Physiol Meas. 2014 May;35(5):833-45. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/5/833. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
To investigate whether lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be directly predicted using CT densitometric measures and assess the underlying prediction errors as compared with the traditional spirometry-based measures. A total of 600 CT examinations were collected from a COPD study. In addition to the entire lung volume, the extent of emphysema depicted in each CT examination was quantified using density mask analysis (densitometry). The partial least square regression was used for constructing the prediction model, where a repeated random split-sample validation was employed. For each split, we randomly selected 400 CT exams for training (regression) purpose and the remaining 200 exams for assessing performance in prediction of lung function (e.g., FEV1 and FEV1/FVC) and disease severity. The absolute and percentage errors as well as their standard deviations were computed. The averaged percentage errors in prediction of FEV1, FEV1/FVC%, TLC, RV/TLC% and DLco% predicted were 33%, 17%, 9%, 18% and 23%, respectively. When classifying the exams in terms of disease severity grades using the CT measures, 37% of the subjects were correctly classified with no error and 83% of the exams were either correctly classified or classified into immediate neighboring categories. The linear weighted kappa and quadratic weighted kappa were 0.54 (moderate agreement) and 0.72 (substantial agreement), respectively. Despite the existence of certain prediction errors in quantitative assessment of lung function, the CT densitometric measures could be used to relatively reliably classify disease severity grade of COPD patients in terms of GOLD.
为了研究能否使用CT密度测量法直接预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的肺功能,并评估与传统基于肺量计的测量方法相比潜在的预测误差。从一项COPD研究中收集了总共600例CT检查。除了全肺容积外,还使用密度掩膜分析(密度测量法)对每次CT检查中肺气肿的范围进行了量化。采用偏最小二乘回归构建预测模型,并采用重复随机分割样本验证。对于每次分割,我们随机选择400例CT检查用于训练(回归)目的,其余200例检查用于评估肺功能(如FEV1和FEV1/FVC)预测和疾病严重程度的表现。计算绝对误差和百分比误差及其标准差。预测FEV1、FEV1/FVC%、TLC、RV/TLC%和DLco%的平均百分比误差分别为33%、17%、9%、18%和23%。当使用CT测量法根据疾病严重程度等级对检查进行分类时,37%的受试者被正确分类且无误差,83%的检查要么被正确分类,要么被分类到紧邻的类别中。线性加权kappa和二次加权kappa分别为0.54(中度一致性)和0.72(高度一致性)。尽管在肺功能的定量评估中存在一定的预测误差,但CT密度测量法可用于相对可靠地根据慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)对COPD患者的疾病严重程度等级进行分类。