Angioli Roberto, Capriglione Stella, Aloisi Alessia, Guzzo Federica, Luvero Daniela, Miranda Andrea, Damiani Patrizio, Montera Roberto, Terranova Corrado, Plotti Francesco
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Rome "Campus Bio-Medico", Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Rome, Italy,
Tumour Biol. 2014 Jul;35(7):7009-15. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1836-x. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
Actually, in literature there are not valid tools able to predict the chemotherapy response during first-line ovarian cancer treatment. CA125 and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) levels of consecutive single-institution patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) were measured during first-line chemotherapy and until 6 months follow-up. First, patients were divided into two groups according to a temporal criterion: patients treated during 2009 (group A: training group) and patients treated during 2010 (group B: verification group). At sixth months follow-up, patients were sub-classified, within both groups, as platinum resistant or platinum sensitive/intermediate, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, and the serum marker courses were further analyzed in each subgroup. Moreover, we performed a logistic regression analysis to choose CA125 and HE4 levels that are best fitted to predict chemoresponse. A total of 76 patients were divided into two groups: group A (n = 42) and group B (n = 34). After 6 months of follow-up, 40 patients were classified as platinum sensitive/intermediate and 36 as platinum resistant. At third chemotherapy cycle, in platinum-resistant patients, HE4 levels were >70 pmol/L in 36 of 36 cases, although in platinum-sensitive/intermediate patients, HE4 levels were >70 pmol/L only in six of 40 cases (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 85 %). Moreover, HE4 reduction of almost 47 % at third chemotherapy cycle reached the sensitivity of 83 % with a specificity of 87 % (positive predictive value = 0.86, negative predictive value = 0.85) in predicting chemoresponse. On the contrary, CA125 values during chemotherapy did not result statistically significant in predicting platinum response. Our findings suggest that HE4 values during first-line chemotherapy could predict chemotherapy response in EOC patients.
实际上,在文献中并没有有效的工具能够预测一线卵巢癌治疗期间的化疗反应。在一线化疗期间及直至6个月随访期,对连续的单机构上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者的CA125和人附睾蛋白4(HE4)水平进行了测量。首先,根据时间标准将患者分为两组:2009年接受治疗的患者(A组:训练组)和2010年接受治疗的患者(B组:验证组)。在6个月随访时,根据实体瘤疗效评价标准,将两组患者再分为铂耐药或铂敏感/中间型,然后在每个亚组中进一步分析血清标志物变化过程。此外,我们进行了逻辑回归分析,以选择最适合预测化疗反应的CA125和HE4水平。总共76例患者分为两组:A组(n = 42)和B组(n = 34)。随访6个月后,40例患者被分类为铂敏感/中间型,36例为铂耐药。在第三个化疗周期时,在铂耐药患者中,36例中有36例的HE4水平>70 pmol/L,而在铂敏感/中间型患者中,40例中只有6例的HE4水平>70 pmol/L(敏感性100%,特异性85%)。此外,在第三个化疗周期时HE4降低近47%在预测化疗反应方面达到了83%的敏感性和87%的特异性(阳性预测值 = 0.86,阴性预测值 = 0.85)。相反,化疗期间的CA125值在预测铂反应方面无统计学意义。我们的研究结果表明,一线化疗期间的HE4值可以预测EOC患者的化疗反应。