Suppr超能文献

低收入国家的治疗性研究:研究试验社区。

Therapeutic research in low-income countries: studying trial communities.

作者信息

Whyte Susan Reynolds

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2014 Nov;99(11):1029-32. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304852. Epub 2014 Apr 19.

Abstract

Social scientists undertaking studies of transnational medical research in developing countries focus on 'trial communities': networks of funders, institutions, researchers, clinical staff, fieldworkers and study participants. They relate these to the political economy that brings powerful research resources to poor settings. Whereas bioethicists tend to consider universal ethical requirements, social scientists examine how ethics are practiced in given situations in the light of the concerns and interests held by different parties involved in medical research. In conditions of poverty, high morbidity and weak public health services, research subjects are heavily induced by the prospect of high quality medical care and other benefits that researchers seem to offer. Studies of medical research undertaken by well-established internationally funded institutions in Africa show that parents are keen to have their children 'join' projects at these organisations. They assess benefits and risks less in terms of specific research projects and more in terms of their overall trust in the care these institutions are known to have provided previously for others in the community. Bioethics should widen its scope beyond concern with protecting individual subjects from the risks of specific research projects. It should recognise that clinical and research functions are indistinguishable for many participants, who want information on results of clinical investigations and sustained support for improving the health of their children.

摘要

从事发展中国家跨国医学研究的社会科学家关注“试验群体”:资助者、机构、研究人员、临床工作人员、实地工作者和研究参与者的网络。他们将这些与将强大研究资源带到贫困地区的政治经济联系起来。生物伦理学家倾向于考虑普遍的伦理要求,而社会科学家则根据参与医学研究的不同各方的关切和利益,研究在特定情况下伦理是如何实践的。在贫困、高发病率和公共卫生服务薄弱的情况下,研究对象受到高质量医疗护理和研究人员似乎提供的其他好处的极大诱惑。对非洲由国际知名资助机构开展的医学研究的调查表明,父母渴望让他们的孩子“加入”这些机构的项目。他们对利益和风险的评估并非基于具体的研究项目,而是更多地基于他们对这些机构此前为社区其他成员提供护理的总体信任。生物伦理学应扩大其范围,不再仅仅关注保护个体受试者免受特定研究项目的风险。它应认识到,对于许多参与者来说,临床功能和研究功能是难以区分的,他们想要临床调查结果的信息,并希望获得持续支持以改善其子女的健康状况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验