Suppr超能文献

鼻中隔偏曲诊断的测量工具:系统评价。

Measurement tools for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation: a systematic review.

机构信息

University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Apr 24;43(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1916-0216-43-11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of measurement tools utilized for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation (NSD).

METHODS

Electronic database searches were performed using MEDLINE (from 1966 to second week of August 2013), EMBASE (from 1966 to second week of August 2013), Web of Science (from 1945 to second week of August 2013) and all Evidence Based Medicine Reviews Files (EBMR); Cochrane Database of Systematic Review (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), Cochrane Methodology Register (CMR), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), American College of Physicians Journal Club (ACP Journal Club), Health Technology Assessments (HTA), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED) till the second quarter of 2013. The search terms used in database searches were 'nasal septum', 'deviation', 'diagnosis', 'nose deformities' and 'nose malformation'. The studies were reviewed using the updated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.

RESULTS

Online searches resulted in 23 abstracts after removal of duplicates that resulted from overlap of studies between the electronic databases. An additional 15 abstracts were excluded due to lack of relevance. A total of 8 studies were systematically reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic modalities such as acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and nasal spectral sound analysis may be useful in identifying NSD in anterior region of the nasal cavity, but these tests in isolation are of limited utility. Compared to anterior rhinoscopy, nasal endoscopy, and imaging the above mentioned index tests lack sensitivity and specificity in identifying the presence, location, and severity of NSD.

摘要

目的

对用于诊断鼻中隔偏曲(NSD)的测量工具进行系统评价。

方法

使用 MEDLINE(从 1966 年到 2013 年 8 月第二周)、EMBASE(从 1966 年到 2013 年 8 月第二周)、Web of Science(从 1945 年到 2013 年 8 月第二周)和所有循证医学评价文献(EBMR);Cochrane 系统评价数据库(CDSR)、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(CCTR)、Cochrane 方法学注册库(CMR)、疗效评价文摘数据库(DARE)、美国医师学会杂志俱乐部(ACP Journal Club)、卫生技术评估(HTA)、英国国家卫生服务经济评价数据库(NHSEED)对 2013 年第二季度前的文献进行电子数据库检索。数据库检索中使用的检索词为“鼻中隔”、“偏曲”、“诊断”、“鼻畸形”和“鼻畸形”。使用更新后的诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)对研究进行评价。

结果

在线搜索后,去除了电子数据库之间重叠研究产生的重复项,得到 23 篇摘要。由于缺乏相关性,又排除了 15 篇摘要。共系统评价了 8 项研究。

结论

声学鼻反射测量、鼻阻力测量和鼻频谱声分析等诊断方法可能有助于识别鼻腔前部的 NSD,但这些测试单独使用的效用有限。与前鼻镜检查、鼻内窥镜检查和影像学相比,上述指标测试在识别 NSD 的存在、位置和严重程度方面缺乏敏感性和特异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验