Suppr超能文献

社区环境中寻求治疗的患者戒烟的应急管理。

Contingency management for smoking cessation among treatment-seeking patients in a community setting.

作者信息

Secades-Villa Roberto, García-Rodríguez Olaya, López-Núñez Carla, Alonso-Pérez Fernando, Fernández-Hermida José R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo, s/n, 33003 Oviedo, Spain.

Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo, s/n, 33003 Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jul 1;140:63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.030. Epub 2014 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contingency management (CM) is an efficacious intervention for reducing cigarette smoking. However, CM is rarely adopted as a smoking cessation treatment in the community. This study analyzed the effectiveness of a CM procedure in combination with a cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for smoking cessation among treatment-seeking patients from the general population.

METHODS

A total of 92 patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions: CBT (N=49) or CBT+CM (N=43). The CM procedure included a voucher program through which nicotine abstinence was reinforced on a schedule of escalating magnitude of reinforcement with a reset contingency. Self-reported smoking status was confirmed with both carbon monoxide (CO) level in expired air and cotinine levels in urine.

RESULTS

Of the patients who received CBT+CM 97.7%, completed 6 weeks of treatment, versus 81.6% of those who received CBT (p=.03). At the post-treatment assessment, 95.3% of the patients assigned to the CBT+CM condition achieved abstinence in comparison to the 59.2% in the CBT group (p=.000). At the one-month follow-up, 72.1% of the patients who received CBT+CM maintained smoking abstinence, versus 34.7% in the CBT group (p=.001). At the six-month follow-up, 51.2% of the patients who received CBT+CM maintained smoking abstinence in comparison to the 28.6% in the CBT group (p=.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this randomized clinical trial showed that adding CM to a CBT is effective, and is feasible as an intervention approach with treatment-seeking patients in a community setting.

摘要

背景

应急管理(CM)是一种有效的戒烟干预措施。然而,CM在社区中很少被用作戒烟治疗方法。本研究分析了CM程序与认知行为疗法(CBT)相结合对普通人群中寻求治疗的患者戒烟的有效性。

方法

总共92名患者被随机分配到两种治疗条件之一:CBT组(N = 49)或CBT + CM组(N = 43)。CM程序包括一个代金券计划,通过该计划,根据强化幅度递增的时间表并采用重置应急措施来强化尼古丁戒断。通过呼出气体中的一氧化碳(CO)水平和尿液中的可替宁水平来确认自我报告的吸烟状态。

结果

接受CBT + CM治疗的患者中有97.7%完成了6周的治疗,而接受CBT治疗的患者这一比例为81.6%(p = 0.03)。在治疗后评估中,分配到CBT + CM组的患者中有95.3%实现了戒烟,而CBT组为59.2%(p = 0.000)。在1个月的随访中,接受CBT + CM治疗的患者中有72.1%保持戒烟状态,而CBT组为34.7%(p = 0.001)。在6个月的随访中,接受CBT + CM治疗的患者中有51.2%保持戒烟状态,而CBT组为28.6%(p = 0.04)。

结论

这项随机临床试验结果表明,在CBT中加入CM是有效的,并且作为一种干预方法在社区环境中对寻求治疗的患者是可行的

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验