• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逆行性肾内手术治疗直径超过2厘米的肾结石是否仍有风险?

Is retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones with diameters exceeding 2 cm still a hazard?

作者信息

Giusti Guido, Proietti Silvia, Luciani Lorenzo G, Peschechera Roberto, Giannantoni Antonella, Taverna Gianluigi, Sortino Giuseppe, Graziotti Pierpaolo

机构信息

IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2014 Apr;21(2):7207-12.

PMID:24775573
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Major kidney stones have traditionally been treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. However, retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), which until a few years ago was considered inappropriate for this purpose, is becoming a viable, attractive alternative. The aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy and safety of RIRS combined with holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of stones > 2 cm in diameter in a large series of patients, reporting complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

By retrospective analysis, we identified a total of 162 patients who were affected by stones greater than 2 cm in diameter and who had undergone RIRS. We reviewed demographic and stone characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

The mean stone size was 2.7 cm +/- 0.6 cm. The primary, secondary, and tertiary stone-free rates were 66%, 80.9%, and 87.7%, respectively. The mean number of procedures per patient was 1.48. The complication rates according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were Clavien I in 20.4% of patients, Clavien II in 0%, Clavien III in 4.9%, Clavien IV in 0.6%, and Clavien V in 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

As an alternative to standard procedures for the treatment of renal calculi greater than 2 cm in diameter, RIRS is safe and effective, with a low complication rate.

摘要

引言

传统上,较大的肾结石采用经皮肾镜取石术治疗。然而,逆行性肾内手术(RIRS),直到几年前还被认为不适用于此目的,如今正成为一种可行且有吸引力的替代方法。本研究的目的是评估RIRS联合钬激光碎石术治疗一系列大量直径>2 cm结石患者的疗效和安全性,并根据Clavien-Dindo分类报告并发症。

材料与方法

通过回顾性分析,我们共确定了162例直径大于2 cm结石且接受了RIRS的患者。我们回顾了人口统计学和结石特征、术中及术后结果以及并发症情况。

结果

平均结石大小为2.7 cm±0.6 cm。一期、二期和三期结石清除率分别为66%、80.9%和87.7%。每位患者的平均手术次数为1.48次。根据Clavien-Dindo分类的并发症发生率为:Clavien I级占20.4%的患者,Clavien II级为0%,Clavien III级为4.9%,Clavien IV级为0.6%,Clavien V级为0%。

结论

作为治疗直径大于2 cm肾结石的标准手术的替代方法,RIRS安全有效,并发症发生率低。

相似文献

1
Is retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of renal stones with diameters exceeding 2 cm still a hazard?逆行性肾内手术治疗直径超过2厘米的肾结石是否仍有风险?
Can J Urol. 2014 Apr;21(2):7207-12.
2
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.输尿管软镜联合激光碎石术治疗多发性单侧肾内结石
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.019. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
3
Is RIRS emerging as the preferred option for the management of 2 cm-4 cm renal stones: our experience.逆行肾内手术是否正在成为治疗2厘米至4厘米肾结石的首选方法:我们的经验
Can J Urol. 2016 Aug;23(4):8364-7.
4
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行软性肾镜碎石术治疗 2-4cm 结石的比较:配对分析。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1384-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10691.x. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
5
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier?柔性输尿管镜检查及激光碎石术治疗单个直径2厘米及以上的肾内结石——这是新的前沿领域吗?
J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):981-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.083. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
6
Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor Staghorn calculi.逆行输尿管肾盂镜治疗2厘米及以上上尿路结石和小型鹿角形结石。
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):346-51.
7
Retrograde intra-renal surgery for stone extraction.逆行性肾内手术取石
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(3):204-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590601016321.
8
Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术(microperc)与逆行性肾内手术治疗小肾结石:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):355-61. doi: 10.1111/bju.12164.
9
Safety and efficacy of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones in patients with a solitary kidney: a single-center experience.孤立肾患者行逆行性肾内手术治疗肾结石的安全性和有效性:单中心经验
J Endourol. 2014 Nov;28(11):1290-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0295. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
10
Bilateral single-session retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of bilateral renal stones.双侧单次逆行性肾内手术治疗双侧肾结石。
Int Braz J Urol. 2013 May-Jun;39(3):387-92. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.03.12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of effectiveness and safety between tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and negative pressure combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery for 2 to 3 cm renal stones.无管经皮肾镜取石术与负压联合逆行肾内手术治疗2至3厘米肾结石的有效性和安全性比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e44291. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044291.
2
International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on staghorn calculi management.国际尿石症联盟(IAU)鹿角结石管理指南。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 25;42(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04816-6.
3
Distal sciatic neuropraxia secondary to lithotomy position: A case report and literature review.
截石位继发坐骨神经远端神经失用症:一例报告及文献综述
Urol Case Rep. 2023 Mar 5;48:102366. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2023.102366. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Comparison of the Efficacy of ShuoTong Ureteroscopy and Simple Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Ureteral Calculi.硕通输尿管镜与单纯软性输尿管镜治疗单侧输尿管上段结石的疗效比较
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 27;8:707022. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.707022. eCollection 2021.
5
Massive retroperitoneal hematoma as an acute complication of retrograde intrarenal surgery: A case report.巨大腹膜后血肿作为逆行性肾内手术的急性并发症:一例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jun 6;9(16):3914-3918. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i16.3914.
6
Initial experience with slimmest single-use flexible ureteroscope Uscope PU3033A (PUSEN™) in retrograde intrarenal surgery and its comparison with Uscope PU3022a: a single-center prospective study.逆行性腔内手术中最细的一次性使用软性输尿管镜 Uscope PU3033A(PUSEN™)的初步经验及其与 Uscope PU3022a 的比较:单中心前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3957-3962. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03707-4. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
Effect of Preoperative Double-J Ureteral Stenting before Flexible Ureterorenoscopy on Stone-free Rates and Complications.软性输尿管肾镜检查术前双J输尿管支架置入对结石清除率及并发症的影响
Curr Med Sci. 2021 Feb;41(1):140-144. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2328-z. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
8
Efficacy and safety of fURS in stones larger than 20 mm: is it still the threshold?大于20毫米结石中输尿管软镜碎石术的疗效与安全性:这仍是阈值吗?
Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(1):49-54. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0056. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
9
Retrograde intrarenal surgery using the single - use flexible ureteroscope Uscope 3022 (Pusen™): evaluation of clinical results.使用一次性软性输尿管镜Uscope 3022(普申™)进行逆行性肾内手术:临床结果评估
Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(2):202-207. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1653. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Ureteroscopic skills with and without Roboflex Avicenna in the K-box simulator.在K-box模拟器中使用和不使用Roboflex Avicenna的输尿管镜技术。
Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(1):76-80. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1180. Epub 2017 Mar 14.