Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Georgia Emerging Infections Program/Atlanta VA Medical Center, and the Georgia Department of Community Health, Atlanta, Georgia; the Emerging Infections Program, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York; the Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico; the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado; the Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, Connecticut; the Oregon Public Health Division, Portland, Oregon; and the California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California.
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;123(4):828-37. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000163.
To describe lapses in adherence to group B streptococcus (GBS) prevention guidelines among cases of early-onset GBS disease in term and preterm neonates and to estimate the potential for further reduction in disease burden under current prevention strategies.
We reviewed labor and delivery and prenatal records of mothers of neonates with early-onset GBS disease (aged younger than 7 days with GBS isolated from a normally sterile site) identified at population-based surveillance sites in 2008-2009. We interviewed prenatal care providers about GBS screening practices and obtained relevant laboratory records. We evaluated the data for errors in prenatal screening, laboratory methods, communication of results, and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. Using published data on screening sensitivity and intrapartum prophylaxis effectiveness, we estimated the potential reduction in cases under optimal prevention implementation.
Among 309 cases, 179 (57.9%) had one or more implementation errors. The most common error type in term and preterm case-patients was prenatal screening (80 of 222 [36.0%]) and intrapartum prophylaxis (46 of 85 [54.1%]), respectively. We estimated that under optimal implementation, cases of early-onset GBS disease could be reduced by 26-59% with the largest benefit from a single intervention coming from improved use of intrapartum prophylaxis (16% decrease).
Further reduction of early-onset GBS disease burden is possible under current prevention strategies, particularly with improved implementation of antibiotic prophylaxis. However, even with perfect adherence to recommended practices, the decline in cases may be modest. Therefore, novel prevention approaches such as improved intrapartum assays and vaccines are also needed.
描述在足月和早产新生儿早发性 B 组链球菌(GBS)疾病病例中,GBS 预防指南的遵循情况存在的疏漏,并根据当前预防策略估计进一步降低疾病负担的潜力。
我们对 2008-2009 年在基于人群的监测点发现的早发性 GBS 疾病(年龄小于 7 天且从正常无菌部位分离出 GBS 的新生儿)的产妇的分娩和产前记录进行了回顾。我们采访了产前保健提供者关于 GBS 筛查实践的情况,并获得了相关实验室记录。我们评估了产前筛查、实验室方法、结果沟通以及产时抗生素预防方面的错误数据。利用已发表的关于筛查敏感性和产时预防有效性的数据,我们估计了在最佳预防措施实施下病例数量的潜在减少。
在 309 例病例中,有 179 例(57.9%)存在一个或多个实施错误。在足月和早产病例中,最常见的错误类型分别是产前筛查(222 例中的 80 例,36.0%)和产时预防(85 例中的 46 例,54.1%)。我们估计,在最佳实施情况下,早发性 GBS 疾病的病例数可以减少 26-59%,其中从单次干预中获益最大的是改善产时预防的使用(减少 16%)。
在当前的预防策略下,进一步降低早发性 GBS 疾病负担是可能的,特别是通过改善抗生素预防的实施。然而,即使完全遵循推荐的做法,病例的下降幅度可能也不大。因此,还需要新的预防方法,如改进的产时检测和疫苗。