Zhang Yiyi, Kennedy Robert, Blasco-Colmenares Elena, Butcher Barbara, Norgard Sanaz, Eldadah Zayd, Dickfeld Timm, Ellenbogen Kenneth A, Marine Joseph E, Guallar Eliseo, Tomaselli Gordon F, Cheng Alan
Departments of Epidemiology and Medicine, and Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Munson Medical Center, Traverse City, Michigan.
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Aug;11(8):1377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.04.039. Epub 2014 May 2.
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the risk of death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Little is known regarding the benefit of this therapy in African Americans (AAs).
The purpose of this study was to determine the association between AA race and outcomes in a cohort of primary prevention ICD patients.
We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with systolic heart failure who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The primary end-point was appropriate ICD shock defined as a shock for rapid ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The secondary end-point was all-cause mortality.
There were 1189 patients (447 AAs and 712 non-AAs) enrolled. Over a median follow-up of 5.1 years, a total of 137 patients experienced an appropriate ICD shock, and 343 died (294 of whom died without receiving an appropriate ICD shock). The multivariate adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) comparing AAs vs non-AAs were 1.24 (0.96-1.59) for all-cause mortality, 1.33 (1.02, 1.74) for all-cause mortality without receiving appropriate ICD shock, and 0.78 (0.51, 1.19) for appropriate ICD shock. Ejection fraction, diabetes, and hypertension appeared to explain 24.1% (10.1%-69.5%), 18.7% (5.3%-58.0%), and 13.6% (3.8%-53.6%) of the excess risk of mortality in AAs, with a large proportion of the mortality difference remaining unexplained.
In patients with primary prevention ICDs, AAs had an increased risk of dying without receiving an appropriate ICD shock compared to non-AAs.
植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)可降低左心室功能不全患者的死亡风险。关于该疗法在非裔美国人(AA)中的益处,人们了解甚少。
本研究旨在确定在一组一级预防ICD患者中,AA种族与预后之间的关联。
我们对因原发性心脏骤停预防而接受ICD植入的收缩性心力衰竭患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。主要终点是适当的ICD电击,定义为因快速室性心律失常而进行的电击。次要终点是全因死亡率。
共纳入1189例患者(447例AA和712例非AA)。在中位随访5.1年期间,共有137例患者经历了适当的ICD电击,343例死亡(其中294例在未接受适当ICD电击的情况下死亡)。比较AA与非AA的多变量调整风险比(95%置信区间),全因死亡率为1.24(0.96 - 1.59),未接受适当ICD电击的全因死亡率为1.33(1.02, 1.74),适当ICD电击为0.78(0.51, 1.19)。射血分数、糖尿病和高血压似乎分别解释了AA中额外死亡风险的24.1%(10.1% - 69.5%)、18.7%(5.3% - 58.0%)和13.6%(3.8% - 53.6%),仍有很大比例的死亡率差异无法解释。
在接受一级预防ICD的患者中,与非AA相比,AA在未接受适当ICD电击的情况下死亡风险增加。