Division of Surgery, Wellspan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania.
Cardiovascular Surgery, Adventist Wockhardt Heart Hospital, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;98(1):142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.078. Epub 2014 May 1.
A clear consensus regarding the optimal source of pulmonary blood flow in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome undergoing the Norwood procedure is lacking.
A literature search was undertaken to identify relevant articles from 2005 to 2012 using "Norwood, stage 1 palliation," "Modified Blalock Taussig shunt (MBTS)," "right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt (RV-PAS)" alone or in combination. Three end points were selected: early/stage 1 mortality, interstage mortality, and interstage total/shunt intervention.
A total of 20 articles, including 19 observational studies and 1 randomized trial (MBTS, n=1,343; RV-PAS, n=1,028), met the inclusion criteria. Mortality after stage 1 was 22% in the MBTS cohort and 16% in RV-PAS cohort. A pooled analysis showed no difference in early mortality between the two groups (risk ratio [RR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.45; p=0.07). On pooling data from contemporary series (similar era) of 8 studies (MBTS, n=709; RV-PAS, n=631), to minimize variability in surgical and postoperative management practices, early mortality in both cohorts was comparable (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.45; p=0.29). Interstage mortality was 13.8% and 4.6% in the MBTS and RV-PAS cohorts, respectively, and was significantly lower for RV-PAS (RR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.89; p<0.00002). However, patients with MBTS had fewer shunt interventions (RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.68; p<0.001; I2=00%).
Our pooled analysis demonstrated no survival benefit for the MBTS or RV-PAS in patients undergoing the Norwood procedure. There appears to be an advantage with the RV-PAS with regard to interstage mortality at the cost of an increased rate of shunt intervention.
对于接受 Norwood 手术的左心发育不全综合征患者,肺动脉血流的最佳来源仍存在争议。
检索 2005 年至 2012 年的相关文献,使用“Norwood 一期姑息术”、“改良 Blalock-Taussig 分流术(MBTS)”、“右心室至肺动脉分流术(RV-PAS)”,以及这些词汇的组合,以确定相关文章。选择三个终点:早期/一期死亡率、中期死亡率和中期/分流干预总死亡率。
共纳入 20 篇文章,包括 19 项观察性研究和 1 项随机试验(MBTS 组 1343 例,RV-PAS 组 1028 例)。MBTS 组一期死亡率为 22%,RV-PAS 组为 16%。荟萃分析显示两组早期死亡率无差异(风险比 [RR],1.20;95%置信区间 [CI],0.99 至 1.45;p=0.07)。对 8 项研究(MBTS 组 709 例,RV-PAS 组 631 例)的当代系列数据(相似时期)进行汇总分析,以尽量减少手术和术后管理实践的差异,两组的早期死亡率相似(RR,1.14;95% CI,0.89 至 1.45;p=0.29)。MBTS 组和 RV-PAS 组的中期死亡率分别为 13.8%和 4.6%,RV-PAS 组明显较低(RR,2.85;95% CI,1.65 至 4.89;p<0.00002)。然而,MBTS 组的分流干预较少(RR,0.55;95% CI,0.44 至 0.68;p<0.001;I2=00%)。
我们的荟萃分析显示,对于接受 Norwood 手术的患者,MBTS 或 RV-PAS 并没有生存获益。RV-PAS 似乎在中期死亡率方面具有优势,但代价是分流干预的发生率增加。