Nunn Amy, MacCarthy Sarah, Barnett Nancy, Rose Jennifer, Chan Philip, Yolken Annajane, Cornwall Alexandra, Chamberlain Nicholas, Barnes Arti, Riggins Reginald, Moore Elya, Simmons Dantrell, Parker Sharon, Mena Leandro
Division of Infectious Diseases, The Miriam Hospital and The Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, 164 Summit Ave, RISE 109, Providence, RI, 02906, USA,
AIDS Behav. 2014 Dec;18(12):2457-68. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0777-0.
Concurrent sexual partnerships, or sexual partnerships that overlap in time, have been associated with HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STI). How best to measure concurrency and the personal characteristics and predictors of concurrency are not yet well understood. We compared two frequently used concurrency definitions, including a self-reported measure based on participant response regarding overlapping sex with partners, and the UNAIDS measure based on overlapping dates of last sex and intention to have sex again. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify socio-demographic, behavioral, and structural predictors of concurrency among 1,542 patients at an urban STI clinic in Jackson, Mississippi. Nearly half (44 %) reported concurrency based on self-reported sex with other partners, and 26 % reported concurrency according to the UNAIDS concurrency measure. Using the self-reported concurrency measure, the strongest predictors of concurrency were perceived partner concurrency, drug use at last sex, having more than 10 lifetime partners, and being recently incarcerated. Strongest predictors of concurrency using the UNAIDS measure were lifetime number of partners and perceived partner concurrency. Concurrency is highly prevalent in this population in the Deep South and social, structural and behavioral factors were important predictors of concurrency for both measures. Future research should use time anchored data collection methods and biomarkers to assess whether both definitions of concurrency are associated with HIV outcomes.
同时存在的性伴侣关系,即时间上重叠的性伴侣关系,已被证实与艾滋病毒和性传播感染(STI)有关。然而,如何最好地衡量性伴侣关系的重叠以及重叠性伴侣关系的个人特征和预测因素,目前尚未得到充分理解。我们比较了两种常用的性伴侣关系重叠的定义,一种是基于参与者对与伴侣性行为重叠情况的自我报告测量方法,另一种是联合国艾滋病规划署(UNAIDS)基于最后一次性行为的重叠日期以及再次发生性行为意愿的测量方法。我们对密西西比州杰克逊市一家城市性传播感染诊所的1542名患者进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定性伴侣关系重叠的社会人口统计学、行为学和结构学预测因素。近一半(44%)的患者基于与其他伴侣的自我报告性行为表示存在性伴侣关系重叠,26%的患者根据联合国艾滋病规划署的性伴侣关系重叠测量方法报告存在性伴侣关系重叠。使用自我报告的性伴侣关系重叠测量方法,性伴侣关系重叠的最强预测因素是感知到的伴侣性伴侣关系重叠、最后一次性行为时吸毒、一生中有超过10个性伴侣以及最近被监禁。使用联合国艾滋病规划署测量方法时,性伴侣关系重叠的最强预测因素是一生性伴侣数量和感知到的伴侣性伴侣关系重叠。在这个美国南部腹地的人群中,性伴侣关系重叠非常普遍,社会、结构和行为因素是两种测量方法中性伴侣关系重叠的重要预测因素。未来的研究应使用基于时间的数据收集方法和生物标志物,以评估这两种性伴侣关系重叠的定义是否都与艾滋病毒感染结果相关。