Perente Irfan, Alkin Zeynep, Ozkaya Abdullah, Dardabounis Doukas, Ogreden Tulin Aras, Konstantinidis Aristeidis, Kyratzoglou Konstantinos, Yazici Ahmet Taylan
Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Bereketzade Cami Sok., Istanbul, Turkey.
University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2014 Spring;3(1):9-16.
This study was performed to evaluate the functional and anatomic outcomes of focal macular laser photocoagulation in eyes with non-center involved macular edema (non-CI ME). Forty-nine eyes of 43 patients with non-CI ME were included. Focal macular laser photocoagulation was conducted on twenty-nine eyes of 25 patients, while 20 eyes of 18 patients with non-CI ME were followed without treatment and served as the control group. Data relating to best corrected visual acuity (BCVA; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) and central subfield thickness (CST), inner zone thickness (IZT), outer zone thickness (OZT), and total macular volume (TMV) as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) were collected and compared between the groups. At 12 months, VA decreased by a mean of 0.4 letters in the treatment group and 3.3 letters in the control group (p=0.03). Gain in VA ≥5 letters was noted in 6 (21%) of the eyes in the treatment group versus 1 (5%) eye in the control group (p=0.12). At 12 months, average IZT decreased by 22.6 microns in the treatment group and increased by 10.9 microns in the control group (p<0.001). The treatment group revealed significant reduction in CST, average OZT, and TMV as compared to the control group at 12 months (all p<0.05).Generally, focal laser photocoagulation may have more favourable visual outcomes in this specific group of diabetic patients than does observation. In addition, focal laser treatment provided better outcomes with improvement in OCT parameters as compared to the control group.
本研究旨在评估局灶性黄斑激光光凝术治疗非中心累及性黄斑水肿(non-CI ME)眼的功能和解剖学转归。纳入了43例患有non-CI ME的患者的49只眼。对25例患者的29只眼进行了局灶性黄斑激光光凝术,而18例患有non-CI ME的患者的20只眼未接受治疗而作为对照组进行随访。收集并比较两组之间与最佳矫正视力(BCVA;早期糖尿病性视网膜病变研究)以及通过光学相干断层扫描(OCT)测定的中心子野厚度(CST)、内区厚度(IZT)、外区厚度(OZT)和黄斑总体积(TMV)相关的数据。12个月时,治疗组的视力平均下降0.4个字母,而对照组下降3.3个字母(p = 0.03)。治疗组中有6只眼(21%)的视力提高≥5个字母,而对照组中只有1只眼(5%)(p = 0.12)。12个月时,治疗组的平均IZT下降了22.6微米,而对照组增加了10.9微米(p<0.001)。与对照组相比,治疗组在12个月时CST、平均OZT和TMV均显著降低(均p<0.05)。一般而言,对于这一特定组的糖尿病患者,局灶性激光光凝术可能比观察等待具有更有利的视力转归。此外,与对照组相比,局灶性激光治疗在改善OCT参数方面提供了更好的结果。