Wolf Jennyfer, Prüss-Ustün Annette, Cumming Oliver, Bartram Jamie, Bonjour Sophie, Cairncross Sandy, Clasen Thomas, Colford John M, Curtis Valerie, De France Jennifer, Fewtrell Lorna, Freeman Matthew C, Gordon Bruce, Hunter Paul R, Jeandron Aurelie, Johnston Richard B, Mäusezahl Daniel, Mathers Colin, Neira Maria, Higgins Julian P T
Department of Public Health and Environment, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Aug;19(8):928-42. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12331. Epub 2014 May 8.
To assess the impact of inadequate water and sanitation on diarrhoeal disease in low- and middle-income settings.
The search strategy used Cochrane Library, MEDLINE & PubMed, Global Health, Embase and BIOSIS supplemented by screening of reference lists from previously published systematic reviews, to identify studies reporting on interventions examining the effect of drinking water and sanitation improvements in low- and middle-income settings published between 1970 and May 2013. Studies including randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised trials with control group, observational studies using matching techniques and observational studies with a control group where the intervention was well defined were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Ottawa-Newcastle scale. Study results were combined using meta-analysis and meta-regression to derive overall and intervention-specific risk estimates.
Of 6819 records identified for drinking water, 61 studies met the inclusion criteria, and of 12,515 records identified for sanitation, 11 studies were included. Overall, improvements in drinking water and sanitation were associated with decreased risks of diarrhoea. Specific improvements, such as the use of water filters, provision of high-quality piped water and sewer connections, were associated with greater reductions in diarrhoea compared with other interventions.
The results show that inadequate water and sanitation are associated with considerable risks of diarrhoeal disease and that there are notable differences in illness reduction according to the type of improved water and sanitation implemented.
评估低收入和中等收入地区水和环境卫生条件不佳对腹泻病的影响。
检索策略采用考克兰图书馆、医学期刊数据库及医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE & PubMed)、全球卫生数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)和生物学文摘数据库(BIOSIS),并辅以对先前发表的系统评价参考文献列表的筛选,以识别报告1970年至2013年5月期间在低收入和中等收入地区改善饮用水和环境卫生效果的干预措施的研究。纳入的研究包括随机对照试验、有对照组的半随机试验、采用匹配技术的观察性研究以及干预措施明确的有对照组的观察性研究。使用改良的渥太华-纽卡斯尔量表评估偏倚风险。采用荟萃分析和荟萃回归合并研究结果,得出总体和特定干预措施的风险估计值。
在为饮用水检索到的6819条记录中,61项研究符合纳入标准;在为环境卫生检索到的12515条记录中,11项研究被纳入。总体而言,饮用水和环境卫生条件的改善与腹泻风险降低相关。与其他干预措施相比,特定的改善措施,如使用滤水器、提供优质管道水和下水道连接,与腹泻发生率的更大幅度降低相关。
结果表明,水和环境卫生条件不佳与腹泻病的高风险相关,并且根据实施的改善水和环境卫生的类型,在疾病减少方面存在显著差异。