Suppr超能文献

多学科重症监护与重症监护医师人员配备:一项全州范围调查的结果及其与死亡率的关联

Multidisciplinary Critical Care and Intensivist Staffing: Results of a Statewide Survey and Association With Mortality.

作者信息

Yoo Erika J, Edwards Jeffrey D, Dean Mitzi L, Dudley R Adams

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;31(5):325-32. doi: 10.1177/0885066614534605. Epub 2014 May 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The role of multidisciplinary teams in improving the care of intensive care unit (ICU) patients is not well defined, and it is unknown whether the use of such teams helps to explain prior research suggesting improved mortality with intensivist staffing. We sought to investigate the association between multidisciplinary team care and survival of medical and surgical patients in nonspecialty ICUs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a community-based, retrospective cohort study of data from 60 330 patients in 181 hospitals participating in a statewide public reporting initiative, the California Hospital Assessment and Reporting Taskforce (CHART). Patient-level data were linked with ICU organizational data collected from a survey of CHART hospital ICUs between December 2010 and June 2011. Clustered logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent effect of multidisciplinary care on the in-hospital mortality of medical and surgical ICU patients. Interactions between multidisciplinary care and intensity of physician staffing were examined to explore whether team care accounted for differences in patient outcomes.

RESULTS

After adjustment for patient characteristics and interactions, there was no association between team care and mortality for medical patients. Among surgical patients, multidisciplinary care was associated with a survival benefit (odds ratio 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-1.00; P = .05). When stratifying by intensity of physician staffing, although the lowest odds of death were observed for surgical patients cared for in ICUs with multidisciplinary teams and high-intensity staffing (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.09; P = .15), followed by ICUs with multidisciplinary teams and low-intensity staffing (odds ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.65-1.09, p = 0.19), these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that multidisciplinary team care may improve outcomes for critically ill surgical patients. However, no relationship was observed between intensity of physician staffing and mortality.

摘要

目的

多学科团队在改善重症监护病房(ICU)患者护理方面的作用尚未明确界定,且使用此类团队是否有助于解释先前研究中提示的重症监护医生配备可降低死亡率的现象也尚不清楚。我们试图调查非专科ICU中多学科团队护理与内科和外科患者生存之间的关联。

材料与方法

我们进行了一项基于社区的回顾性队列研究,分析了参与全州公共报告倡议(加利福尼亚医院评估与报告工作组,CHART)的181家医院中60330例患者的数据。患者层面的数据与2010年12月至2011年6月期间对CHART医院ICU进行调查所收集的ICU组织数据相关联。采用聚类逻辑回归评估多学科护理对内科和外科ICU患者院内死亡率的独立影响。研究多学科护理与医生配备强度之间的相互作用,以探讨团队护理是否能解释患者结局的差异。

结果

在对患者特征和相互作用进行调整后,团队护理与内科患者死亡率之间无关联。在外科患者中,多学科护理与生存获益相关(比值比0.79;95%置信区间[CI],0.62 - 1.00;P = 0.05)。按医生配备强度分层时,尽管在配备多学科团队和高强度人员的ICU中接受治疗的外科患者死亡几率最低(比值比,0.77;95% CI,0.55 - 1.09;P = 0.15),其次是配备多学科团队和低强度人员的ICU(比值比0.84,95% CI 0.65 - 1.09,p = 0.19),但这些差异无统计学意义。

结论

我们的结果表明,多学科团队护理可能改善重症外科患者的结局。然而,未观察到医生配备强度与死亡率之间的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验