Stevens Jeffrey R
Department of Psychology, Center for Brain, Biology, and Behavior, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0156, USA
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jul 7;281(1786). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0499.
From finding food to choosing mates, animals must make intertemporal choices that involve fitness benefits available at different times. Species vary dramatically in their willingness to wait for delayed rewards. Why does this variation across species exist? An adaptive approach to intertemporal choice suggests that time preferences should reflect the temporal problems faced in a species's environment. Here, I use phylogenetic regression to test whether allometric factors relating to body size, relative brain size and social group size predict how long 13 primate species will wait in laboratory intertemporal choice tasks. Controlling for phylogeny, a composite allometric factor that includes body mass, absolute brain size, lifespan and home range size predicted waiting times, but relative brain size and social group size did not. These findings support the notion that selective pressures have sculpted intertemporal choices to solve adaptive problems faced by animals. Collecting these types of data across a large number of species can provide key insights into the evolution of decision making and cognition.
从寻找食物到选择配偶,动物必须做出涉及不同时间可得的适应性益处的跨期选择。物种在等待延迟奖励的意愿上差异极大。为何物种间会存在这种差异呢?一种关于跨期选择的适应性方法表明,时间偏好应反映一个物种在其环境中所面临的时间问题。在此,我运用系统发育回归来检验与体型、相对脑容量和社会群体规模相关的异速生长因素是否能预测13种灵长类物种在实验室跨期选择任务中等待的时长。在控制系统发育的情况下,一个包含体重、绝对脑容量、寿命和活动范围大小的综合异速生长因素能够预测等待时间,但相对脑容量和社会群体规模则不能。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即选择压力塑造了跨期选择以解决动物所面临的适应性问题。收集大量物种的这类数据能够为决策制定和认知的进化提供关键见解。