Kinders Robert, Ferry-Galow Kate, Wang Lihua, Srivastava Apurva K, Ji Jiuping Jay, Parchment Ralph E
Authors' Affiliations: Laboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology; National Cancer Target Validation Laboratory, Applied/Developmental Research Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research and Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland
Authors' Affiliations: Laboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology; National Cancer Target Validation Laboratory, Applied/Developmental Research Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research and Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick, Maryland.
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 May 15;20(10):2578-86. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0476.
There is a "life cycle" of pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker assays that guides the development and clinical implementation in our laboratories. The well-recognized elements of analytical assay validation and demonstration of fitness-for-purpose of the biomarker, specimen collection, handling, and assay methods are only a part of the required activities. Assay transfer across laboratories and testing on actual human clinical specimens are vital for understanding assay performance and robustness. In our experience, this patient specimen-centered approach has required assay method modifications, some unexpected, but which were critical to successful implementation in clinical trials. In addition, dispersing assays throughout the National Cancer Institute's clinical trials network has required the development of calibrator and control materials as well as formal training courses for smooth implementation. One measure of success of this approach has been that a number of the assays developed at NCI's Frederick National Laboratory have ultimately reached the stage of commercialization, enabling wide accessibility of the PD biomarker assays by the research community. See all articles in this ccr focus section, "Progress in pharmacodynamic endpoints."
药效学生物标志物检测存在一个“生命周期”,它指导着我们实验室的研发和临床应用。分析检测验证以及生物标志物适用性证明、样本采集、处理和检测方法等广为人知的要素,只是所需活动的一部分。跨实验室的检测转移以及在实际人类临床样本上的检测,对于了解检测性能和稳健性至关重要。根据我们的经验,这种以患者样本为中心的方法需要对检测方法进行修改,其中一些修改出乎意料,但对于在临床试验中成功实施至关重要。此外,在整个国家癌症研究所的临床试验网络中分散检测,需要开发校准物和对照材料以及正规培训课程,以确保顺利实施。这种方法成功的一个标志是,美国国立癌症研究所弗雷德里克国家实验室开发的一些检测最终达到了商业化阶段,使研究界能够广泛使用药效学生物标志物检测。查看本期《临床癌症研究》聚焦部分的所有文章,“药效学终点的进展”。