Sundström Kristian, Wahlström Helene, Ivarsson Sofie, Sternberg Lewerin Susanna
Institute for Food and Agricultural Economics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Zoonosis Center, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2014 May 15;9(5):e96446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096446. eCollection 2014.
The objective of the study was to analyse the economic effects of introducing alternative Salmonella control strategies in Sweden. Current control strategies in Denmark and the Netherlands were used as benchmarks. The true number of human Salmonella cases was estimated by reconstructing the reporting pyramids for the various scenarios. Costs were calculated for expected changes in human morbidity (Salmonella and two of its sequelae), for differences in the control programmes and for changes in cattle morbidity. The net effects (benefits minus costs) were negative in all scenarios (€ -5 to -105 million), implying that it would not be cost-effective to introduce alternative control strategies in Sweden. This result was mainly due to an expected increase in the incidence of Salmonella in humans (6035-57108 reported and unreported new cases/year), with expected additional costs of € 5-55 million. Other increased costs were due to expected higher incidences of sequelae (€ 3-49 million) and a higher cattle morbidity (€ 4-8 million). Benefits in terms of lower control costs amounted to € 4-7 million.
该研究的目的是分析在瑞典引入替代沙门氏菌控制策略的经济影响。丹麦和荷兰的现行控制策略被用作基准。通过重建各种情景下的报告金字塔来估计人类沙门氏菌病例的实际数量。计算了人类发病率(沙门氏菌及其两种后遗症)预期变化的成本、控制计划差异的成本以及牛发病率变化的成本。所有情景下的净效应(收益减去成本)均为负(-500万至-1.05亿欧元),这意味着在瑞典引入替代控制策略不具有成本效益。这一结果主要是由于预计人类沙门氏菌发病率会上升(每年有6035 - 57108例报告和未报告的新病例),预计额外成本为500万至5500万欧元。其他成本增加是由于后遗症发病率预计会更高(300万至4900万欧元)以及牛发病率更高(400万至800万欧元)。控制成本降低带来的收益为400万至700万欧元。