Suppr超能文献

小题大做?2型糖尿病患者转换基础胰岛素类似物的真实世界研究。

Much ado about nothing? A real-world study of patients with type 2 diabetes switching Basal insulin analogs.

作者信息

Wei Wenhui, Zhou Steve, Miao Raymond, Pan Chunshen, Xie Lin, Baser Onur, Gill Jasvinder

机构信息

Sanofi US, Inc., Mail Stop 55C-220A, 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater, NJ, 08807, USA,

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2014 May;31(5):539-60. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0120-1. Epub 2014 May 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive disease, and many patients eventually require insulin therapy. This study examined real-world outcomes of switching basal insulin analogs among patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Using two large United States administrative claims databases (IMPACT(®) and Humana(®)), this longitudinal retrospective study examined two cohorts of adult patients with T2DM. Previously on insulin glargine, Cohort 1 either continued insulin glargine (GLA-C) or switched to insulin detemir (DET-S), while Cohort 2 was previously on insulin detemir, and either continued insulin detemir (DET-C) or switched to insulin glargine (GLA-S). One-year follow-up treatment persistence and adherence, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), hypoglycemia events, healthcare utilization and costs were assessed. Selection bias was minimized by propensity score matching between treatment groups within each cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 5,921 patients (mean age 60 years, female 50.0%, HbA1c 8.6%) were included in the analysis (Cohort 1: IMPACT(®): n = 536 DET-S matched to n = 2,668 GLA-C; Humana(®): n = 256 DET-S matched to n = 1,262 GLA-C; Cohort 2: n = 419 GLA-S matched to n = 780 DET-C), with similar baseline characteristics between treatment groups in each cohort. During 1-year follow-up, in Cohort 1, DET-S patients, when compared with GLA-C patients, had lower treatment persistence/adherence with 33-40% restarting insulin glargine, higher rapid-acting insulin use, worse HbA1c outcomes, significantly higher diabetes drug costs, and similar hypoglycemia rates, health care utilization and total costs. However, in Cohort 2 overall opposite outcomes were observed and only 19.8% GLA-S patients restarted insulin detemir.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed contrasting clinical and economic outcomes when patients with T2DM switched basal insulin analogs, with worse outcomes observed for patients switching from insulin glargine to insulin detemir and improved outcomes when switching from insulin detemir to insulin glargine. Further investigation into the therapeutic interchangeability of insulin glargine and insulin detemir in the real-world setting is needed.

摘要

引言

2型糖尿病(T2DM)是一种进行性疾病,许多患者最终需要胰岛素治疗。本研究调查了T2DM患者中基础胰岛素类似物转换的实际效果。

方法

利用两个美国大型行政索赔数据库(IMPACT®和Humana®),这项纵向回顾性研究调查了两组成年T2DM患者。队列1之前使用甘精胰岛素,要么继续使用甘精胰岛素(GLA-C),要么换用地特胰岛素(DET-S),而队列2之前使用地特胰岛素,要么继续使用地特胰岛素(DET-C),要么换用甘精胰岛素(GLA-S)。评估了一年的随访治疗持续性和依从性、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、低血糖事件、医疗保健利用情况和成本。通过各队列内治疗组之间的倾向得分匹配,将选择偏倚降至最低。

结果

共有5921名患者(平均年龄60岁,女性占50.0%,HbA1c为8.6%)纳入分析(队列1:IMPACT®:n = 536名DET-S与n = 2668名GLA-C匹配;Humana®:n = 256名DET-S与n = 1262名GLA-C匹配;队列2:n = 419名GLA-S与n = 780名DET-C匹配),各队列中治疗组之间的基线特征相似。在1年的随访期间,在队列1中,与GLA-C患者相比,DET-S患者的治疗持续性/依从性较低,有33 - 40%的患者重新开始使用甘精胰岛素,速效胰岛素使用量较高,HbA1c结果较差,糖尿病药物成本显著更高,低血糖发生率、医疗保健利用率和总成本相似。然而,在队列2中观察到总体相反的结果,只有19.8%的GLA-S患者重新开始使用地特胰岛素。

结论

本研究显示,T2DM患者转换基础胰岛素类似物时,临床和经济结果存在差异,从甘精胰岛素转换为地特胰岛素的患者结果较差,而从地特胰岛素转换为甘精胰岛素的患者结果有所改善。需要在现实环境中进一步研究甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素的治疗互换性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/763c/4033813/04877cc22743/12325_2014_120_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验