Tampere Center for Child Health Research, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Gastroenterology. 2014 Sep;147(3):610-617.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 13.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated whether screen-detected and apparently asymptomatic adults with endomysial antibodies (EmA) benefit from a gluten-free diet (GFD).
We performed a prospective trial of 3031 individuals at risk for celiac disease based on screens for EmA. Of 148 seropositive individuals, 40 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were assigned randomly to groups placed on a GFD or gluten-containing diets. We evaluated ratios of small-bowel mucosal villous height:crypt depth, serology and laboratory test results, gastrointestinal symptom scores, physiologic well-being, perception of health by a visual analog scale, bone mineral density, and body composition at baseline and after 1 year. Thereafter, the group on the gluten-containing diet started a GFD and was evaluated a third time; subjects in the GFD group remained on this diet.
After 1 year on the GFD, the mean mucosal villous height:crypt depth values increased (P < .001), levels of celiac-associated antibodies decreased (P < .003), and gastrointestinal symptoms improved to a greater extent than in patients on gluten-containing diets (P = .003). The GFD group also had reduced indigestion (P = .006), reflux (P = .05), and anxiety (P = .025), and better health, based on the visual analog scale (P = .017), than the gluten-containing diet group. Only social function scores improved more in the gluten-containing diet group than in the GFD group (P = .031). There were no differences between groups in laboratory test results, bone mineral density, or body composition. Most measured parameters improved when patients in the gluten-containing diet group were placed on GFDs. No subjects considered their experience to be negative and most expected to remain on GFDs.
GFDs benefit asymptomatic EmA-positive patients. The results support active screening of patients at risk for celiac disease. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT01116505.
我们研究了是否内镜下发现的无症状且伴有内肌层抗体(EmA)的成年人可从无麸质饮食(GFD)中获益。
我们对基于 EmA 筛查的 3031 名有患乳糜泻风险的个体进行了前瞻性试验。在 148 例血清阳性个体中,40 例符合纳入标准并被随机分配到接受 GFD 或含麸质饮食的组。我们评估了小肠黏膜绒毛高度与隐窝深度比值、血清学和实验室检查结果、胃肠道症状评分、生理舒适度、视觉模拟量表评估的健康感知、骨密度和身体成分,这些指标在基线和 1 年后进行评估。此后,含麸质饮食组开始接受 GFD,第三次评估;GFD 组继续接受 GFD。
在 GFD 治疗 1 年后,黏膜绒毛高度与隐窝深度比值增加(P < 0.001),乳糜泻相关抗体水平下降(P < 0.003),胃肠道症状改善程度大于接受含麸质饮食的患者(P = 0.003)。GFD 组消化不良(P = 0.006)、反流(P = 0.05)和焦虑(P = 0.025)的发生频率也降低,视觉模拟量表评估的健康状况也更好(P = 0.017)。仅含麸质饮食组的社会功能评分改善程度大于 GFD 组(P = 0.031)。两组间实验室检查结果、骨密度或身体成分无差异。当含麸质饮食组的患者接受 GFD 时,大多数测量参数均得到改善。没有患者认为自己的经历是负面的,大多数患者希望继续接受 GFD。
GFD 有益于无症状 EmA 阳性患者。结果支持对乳糜泻高危患者进行主动筛查。临床试验.gov 注册号:NCT01116505。