Kato Clinic of Internal Medicine Tokyo Japan.
J Diabetes Investig. 2013 Sep 13;4(5):450-3. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12072. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
The aim of the preset study was to investigate the effectiveness of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in insufficiently controlled insulin-treated diabetes. A total of 86 insulin-treated patients were randomized to a routine testing group (RTG; n = 43) and a structured testing group (STG; n = 43). The STG used a chart to record seven-point blood glucose (BG) profile on three consecutive days per month. The primary end-point was the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 3 months and 6 months. There were no significant differences of HbA1c between the RTG and STG at 3 months. However, the STG had significantly improved HbA1c at 6-month follow-up compared with the RTG (P = 0.002). In the STG, HbA1c decreased by 0.5% from 7.9 (SD 0.5) to 7.4 (0.7)%, whereas it decreased by 0.1% in the RTG from 7.9 (0.5) to 7.8 (0.7)%. In the STG, 55% of the patients were willing to continue structured SMBG and they achieved a 0.7% decrease of HbA1c. The present findings suggest that structured SMBG significantly improves glycemic control.
本研究旨在探讨结构化自我血糖监测(SMBG)对胰岛素治疗控制不佳的糖尿病患者的有效性。共有 86 名接受胰岛素治疗的患者被随机分为常规检测组(RTG;n=43)和结构化检测组(STG;n=43)。STG 使用图表记录每月连续三天的七点血糖(BG)谱。主要终点是 3 个月和 6 个月时的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。3 个月时,RTG 和 STG 之间的 HbA1c 无显著差异。然而,与 RTG 相比,STG 在 6 个月随访时 HbA1c 显著改善(P=0.002)。在 STG 中,HbA1c 从 7.9(SD 0.5)降至 7.4(0.7)%,下降了 0.5%,而 RTG 中 HbA1c 从 7.9(0.5)降至 7.8(0.7)%,仅下降了 0.1%。在 STG 中,55%的患者愿意继续进行结构化 SMBG,他们的 HbA1c 降低了 0.7%。本研究结果表明,结构化 SMBG 可显著改善血糖控制。