Suppr超能文献

结构化自我血糖监测可降低胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白水平。

Structured self-monitoring of blood glucose reduces glycated hemoglobin in insulin-treated diabetes.

机构信息

Kato Clinic of Internal Medicine Tokyo Japan.

出版信息

J Diabetes Investig. 2013 Sep 13;4(5):450-3. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12072. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

Abstract

The aim of the preset study was to investigate the effectiveness of structured self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in insufficiently controlled insulin-treated diabetes. A total of 86 insulin-treated patients were randomized to a routine testing group (RTG; n = 43) and a structured testing group (STG; n = 43). The STG used a chart to record seven-point blood glucose (BG) profile on three consecutive days per month. The primary end-point was the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 3 months and 6 months. There were no significant differences of HbA1c between the RTG and STG at 3 months. However, the STG had significantly improved HbA1c at 6-month follow-up compared with the RTG (P = 0.002). In the STG, HbA1c decreased by 0.5% from 7.9 (SD 0.5) to 7.4 (0.7)%, whereas it decreased by 0.1% in the RTG from 7.9 (0.5) to 7.8 (0.7)%. In the STG, 55% of the patients were willing to continue structured SMBG and they achieved a 0.7% decrease of HbA1c. The present findings suggest that structured SMBG significantly improves glycemic control.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨结构化自我血糖监测(SMBG)对胰岛素治疗控制不佳的糖尿病患者的有效性。共有 86 名接受胰岛素治疗的患者被随机分为常规检测组(RTG;n=43)和结构化检测组(STG;n=43)。STG 使用图表记录每月连续三天的七点血糖(BG)谱。主要终点是 3 个月和 6 个月时的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。3 个月时,RTG 和 STG 之间的 HbA1c 无显著差异。然而,与 RTG 相比,STG 在 6 个月随访时 HbA1c 显著改善(P=0.002)。在 STG 中,HbA1c 从 7.9(SD 0.5)降至 7.4(0.7)%,下降了 0.5%,而 RTG 中 HbA1c 从 7.9(0.5)降至 7.8(0.7)%,仅下降了 0.1%。在 STG 中,55%的患者愿意继续进行结构化 SMBG,他们的 HbA1c 降低了 0.7%。本研究结果表明,结构化 SMBG 可显著改善血糖控制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4cb/4025113/babee1da1968/jdi-4-450-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验