Koch Elard
Institute of Molecular Epidemiology (MELISA), Center of Embryonic Medicine and Maternal Health, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Chile.
Linacre Q. 2013 May;80(2):151-60. doi: 10.1179/0024363913Z.00000000022.
Improving maternal health and decreasing morbidity and mortality due to induced abortion are key endeavors in developing countries. One of the most controversial subjects surrounding interventions to improve maternal health is the effect of abortion laws. Chile offers a natural laboratory to perform an investigation on the determinants influencing maternal health in a large parallel time-series of maternal deaths, analyzing health and socioeconomic indicators, and legislative policies including abortion banning in 1989. Interestingly, abortion restriction in Chile was not associated with an increase in overall maternal mortality or with abortion deaths and total number of abortions. Contrary to the notion proposing a negative impact of restrictive abortion laws on maternal health, the abortion mortality ratio did not increase after the abortion ban in Chile. Rather, it decreased over 96 percent, from 10.8 to 0.39 per 100,000 live births. Thus, the Chilean natural experiment provides for the first time, strong evidence supporting the hypothesis that legalization of abortion is unnecessary to improve maternal health in Latin America.
改善孕产妇健康状况以及降低人工流产导致的发病率和死亡率是发展中国家的关键努力方向。围绕改善孕产妇健康的干预措施,最具争议性的话题之一就是堕胎法的影响。智利提供了一个天然实验室,可在一个关于孕产妇死亡的大型平行时间序列中,对影响孕产妇健康的决定因素进行调查,分析健康和社会经济指标以及包括1989年堕胎禁令在内的立法政策。有趣的是,智利的堕胎限制与总体孕产妇死亡率的上升、堕胎死亡人数以及堕胎总数均无关联。与认为限制性堕胎法会对孕产妇健康产生负面影响的观点相反,智利实施堕胎禁令后,堕胎死亡率并未上升。相反,它下降了96%以上,从每10万例活产中的10.8例降至0.39例。因此,智利的自然实验首次提供了有力证据,支持了在拉丁美洲,堕胎合法化对于改善孕产妇健康并非必要这一假设。