Rock Michael J, Makholm Linda, Eickhoff Jens
Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, USA.
J Cyst Fibros. 2014 Sep;13(5):520-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 23.
Conventional methods of sweat testing are time consuming and have many steps that can and do lead to errors. This study compares conventional sweat testing to a new quantitative method, the CF Quantum® (CFQT) sweat test. This study tests the diagnostic accuracy and analytic validity of the CFQT.
Previously diagnosed CF patients and patients who required a sweat test for clinical indications were invited to have the CFQT test performed. Both conventional sweat testing and the CFQT were performed bilaterally on the same day. Pairs of data from each test are plotted as a correlation graph and Bland-Altman plot. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated as well as the means and coefficient of variation by test and by extremity. After completing the study, subjects or their parents were asked for their preference of the CFQT and conventional sweat testing.
The correlation coefficient between the CFQT and conventional sweat testing was 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.97-0.99). The sensitivity and specificity of the CFQT in diagnosing CF was 100% (95% confidence interval: 94-100%) and 96% (95% confidence interval: 89-99%), respectively. In one center in this three center multicenter study, there were higher sweat chloride values in patients with CF and also more tests that were invalid due to discrepant values between the two extremities. The percentage of invalid tests was higher in the CFQT method (16.5%) compared to conventional sweat testing (3.8%) (p < 0.001). In the post-test questionnaire, 88% of subjects/parents preferred the CFQT test.
The CFQT is a fast and simple method of quantitative sweat chloride determination. This technology requires further refinement to improve the analytic accuracy at higher sweat chloride values and to decrease the number of invalid tests.
传统的汗液检测方法耗时且步骤繁多,容易导致错误。本研究将传统汗液检测与一种新的定量方法——CF Quantum®(CFQT)汗液检测进行比较。本研究测试了CFQT的诊断准确性和分析效度。
邀请先前诊断为囊性纤维化(CF)的患者以及因临床指征需要进行汗液检测的患者进行CFQT检测。传统汗液检测和CFQT检测均在同一天双侧进行。将每次检测的成对数据绘制为相关图和布兰德-奥特曼图。计算敏感性和特异性,以及按检测方法和肢体计算的均值和变异系数。在完成研究后,询问受试者或其父母对CFQT检测和传统汗液检测的偏好。
CFQT与传统汗液检测之间的相关系数为0.98(95%置信区间:0.97 - 0.99)。CFQT诊断CF的敏感性和特异性分别为100%(95%置信区间:94 - 100%)和96%(95%置信区间:89 - 99%)。在这项三中心多中心研究的一个中心,CF患者的汗液氯化物值较高,并且由于双侧值不一致导致更多检测无效。CFQT方法的无效检测百分比(16.5%)高于传统汗液检测(3.8%)(p < 0.001)。在测试后的问卷中,88%的受试者/父母更喜欢CFQT检测。
CFQT是一种快速简便的定量汗液氯化物测定方法。该技术需要进一步改进,以提高在较高汗液氯化物值时的分析准确性,并减少无效检测的数量。