Govindan Sushant, Shapiro Letitia, Langa Kenneth M, Iwashyna Theodore J
Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, HSR&D Center for Excellence, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America; Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 May 30;9(5):e97714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097714. eCollection 2014.
Death certificates are a primary data source for assessing the population burden of diseases; however, there are concerns regarding their accuracy. Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) coding of a terminal hospitalization may provide an alternative view. We analyzed the rate and patterns of disagreement between death certificate data and hospital claims for patients who died during an inpatient hospitalization.
We studied respondents from the Health and Retirement Study (a nationally representative sample of older Americans who had an inpatient death documented in the linked Medicare claims from 1993-2007). Causes of death abstracted from death certificates were aggregated to the standard National Center for Health Statistics List of 50 Rankable Causes of Death. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-DRGs were manually aggregated into a parallel classification. We then compared the two systems via 2×2, focusing on concordance. Our primary analysis was agreement between the two data sources, assessed with percentages and Cohen's kappa statistic.
2074 inpatient deaths were included in our analysis. 36.6% of death certificate cause-of-death codes agreed with the reason for the terminal hospitalization in the Medicare claims at the broad category level; when re-classifying DRGs without clear alignment as agreements, the concordance only increased to 61%. Overall Kappa was 0.21, or "fair." Death certificates in this cohort redemonstrated the conventional top 3 causes of death as diseases of the heart, malignancy, and cerebrovascular disease. However, hospitalization claims data showed infections, diseases of the heart, and cerebrovascular disease as the most common diagnoses for the same terminal hospitalizations.
There are significant differences between Medicare claims and death certificate data in assigning cause of death for inpatients. The importance of infections as proximal causes of death is underestimated by current death certificate-based strategies.
死亡证明是评估人群疾病负担的主要数据源;然而,人们对其准确性存在担忧。终末期住院的诊断相关分组(DRG)编码可能提供另一种视角。我们分析了住院期间死亡患者的死亡证明数据与医院理赔数据之间的不一致率及模式。
我们研究了健康与退休研究的受访者(这是一个具有全国代表性的美国老年人样本,其在1993 - 2007年的医疗保险关联理赔记录中有住院死亡情况)。从死亡证明中提取的死因被汇总到美国国家卫生统计中心的50种可排名死因标准列表中。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的DRG被手动汇总成一个平行分类。然后我们通过2×2比较这两个系统,重点关注一致性。我们的主要分析是评估两个数据源之间的一致性,用百分比和科恩kappa统计量来衡量。
我们的分析纳入了2074例住院死亡病例。在大类层面,36.6%的死亡证明死因编码与医疗保险理赔记录中的终末期住院原因一致;当将没有明确对应关系的DRG重新归类为一致时,一致性仅增至61%。总体kappa值为0.21,即“一般”。该队列中的死亡证明再次显示,传统的前三大死因是心脏病、恶性肿瘤和脑血管疾病。然而,住院理赔数据显示,相同终末期住院病例中最常见的诊断是感染、心脏病和脑血管疾病。
在确定住院患者死因方面,医疗保险理赔数据和死亡证明数据存在显著差异。当前基于死亡证明的策略低估了感染作为近端死因的重要性。