Suppr超能文献

不同血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与糖尿病发病率:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。

Different angiotensin receptor blockers and incidence of diabetes: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

作者信息

Chang Chia-Hsuin, Chang Yi-Cheng, Wu Li-Chiu, Lin Jou-Wei, Chuang Lee-Ming, Lai Mei-Shu

机构信息

Institute of Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 May 14;13:91. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-91.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been shown to exert various peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) binding activities and insulin-sensitizing effects. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of different ARBs with new-onset diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

In the respective cohort, a total of 492,530 subjects who initiated ARB treatment between January 2004 and December 2009 were identified from Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. The primary outcome was newly diagnosed diabetes, defined as at least one hospital admission or two or more outpatient visits within a year with an ICD-9-CM code 250. Cox proportional regression was used to estimate the risk of diabetes associated with each ARB, using losartan as the reference.

RESULTS

A total of 65,358 incident diabetes cases were identified out of 1,771,173 person-years. Olmesartan initiators had a small but significantly increased risk of developing diabetes after adjusting for baseline characteristics and mean daily dose (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.12). After excluding those followed for less than one year, the increase in diabetes risk are more pronounced (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05-1.14). This association was consistent across all subgroup analyses. Similar results were observed when a more strict definition of diabetes combining both diabetes diagnosis and anti-diabetic treatment was used. On the other hand, there was no difference in diabetes risk between telmisartan and losartan.

CONCLUSIONS

Among all ARBs, olmesartan might be associated with a slightly increased risk of diabetes mellitus. Our data suggest differential diabetes risks associated with ARBs beyond a class effect.

摘要

背景

血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)已被证明具有多种过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(PPARγ)结合活性和胰岛素增敏作用。本研究的目的是调查不同ARBs与新发糖尿病之间的关联。

方法

在各自的队列中,从台湾国民健康保险数据库中识别出2004年1月至2009年12月期间开始接受ARB治疗的492,530名受试者。主要结局是新诊断的糖尿病,定义为一年内至少一次住院或两次或更多次门诊就诊,ICD-9-CM编码为250。使用氯沙坦作为对照,采用Cox比例回归来估计与每种ARB相关的糖尿病风险。

结果

在1,771,173人年中,共识别出65,358例糖尿病病例。在调整基线特征和平均每日剂量后,奥美沙坦使用者患糖尿病的风险虽小但显著增加(风险比[HR],1.07;95%置信区间[CI],1.03 - 1.12)。在排除随访时间少于一年的患者后,糖尿病风险的增加更为明显(HR,1.09;95%CI,1.05 - 1.14)。这种关联在所有亚组分析中都是一致的。当使用结合糖尿病诊断和抗糖尿病治疗的更严格糖尿病定义时,也观察到了类似结果。另一方面,替米沙坦和氯沙坦之间的糖尿病风险没有差异。

结论

在所有ARBs中,奥美沙坦可能与糖尿病风险略有增加有关。我们的数据表明,ARBs存在超出类效应的不同糖尿病风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5472/4039330/fe149d32a036/1475-2840-13-91-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验