Spiritual Care, Department of Palliative Medicine at the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jun 5;14:112. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-112.
This article examines spiritual care training provided to healthcare professionals in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The paper reveals the current extent of available training while defining the target group(s) and teaching aims. In addition to those, we will provide an analysis of delivered competencies, applied teaching and performance assessment methods.
In 2013, an anonymous online survey was conducted among the members of the International Society for Health and Spiritual Care. The survey consisted of 10 questions and an open field for best practice advice. SPSS21 was used for statistical data analysis and the MAXQDA2007 for thematic content analysis.
33 participants participated in the survey. The main providers of spiritual care training are hospitals (36%, n = 18). 57% (n = 17) of spiritual care training forms part of palliative care education. 43% (n = 13) of spiritual care education is primarily bound to the Christian tradition. 36% (n = 11) of provided trainings have no direct association with any religious conviction. 64% (n = 19) of respondents admitted that they do not use any specific definition for spiritual care. 22% (n = 14) of available spiritual care education leads to some academic degree. 30% (n = 19) of training form part of an education programme leading to a formal qualification. Content analysis revealed that spiritual training for medical students, physicians in paediatrics, and chaplains take place only in the context of palliative care education. Courses provided for multidisciplinary team education may be part of palliative care training. Other themes, such as deep listening, compassionate presence, bedside spirituality or biographical work on the basis of logo-therapy, are discussed within the framework of spiritual care.
Spiritual care is often approached as an integral part of grief management, communication/interaction training, palliative care, (medical) ethics, psychological or religious counselling or cultural competencies. Respondents point out the importance of competency based spiritual care education, practical training and maintaining the link between spiritual care education and clinical practice. Further elaboration on the specifics of spiritual care core competencies, teaching and performance assessment methods is needed.
本文研究了德国、奥地利和瑞士的医疗保健专业人员所接受的灵性关怀培训。本文揭示了当前培训的范围,确定了目标群体和教学目标。除此之外,我们还将分析所提供的能力、应用的教学和绩效评估方法。
2013 年,我们对国际健康与灵性关怀协会的成员进行了一项匿名在线调查。该调查共包含 10 个问题和一个提供最佳实践建议的开放领域。我们使用 SPSS21 进行统计数据分析,使用 MAXQDA2007 进行主题内容分析。
共有 33 名参与者参与了调查。灵性关怀培训的主要提供者是医院(36%,n=18)。57%(n=17)的灵性关怀培训是姑息治疗教育的一部分。43%(n=13)的灵性关怀教育主要与基督教传统有关。36%(n=11)的培训与任何宗教信仰都没有直接联系。64%(n=19)的受访者承认他们没有使用任何特定的灵性关怀定义。22%(n=14)的可用灵性关怀教育可获得一些学术学位。30%(n=19)的培训是正式资格教育计划的一部分。内容分析显示,医学生、儿科医生和牧师的灵性培训仅在姑息治疗教育的背景下进行。为多学科团队教育提供的课程可能是姑息治疗培训的一部分。其他主题,如深度倾听、富有同情心的存在、床边灵性或基于标志疗法的传记工作,都是在灵性关怀的框架内讨论的。
灵性关怀通常被视为悲伤管理、沟通/互动培训、姑息治疗、(医学)伦理、心理或宗教咨询或文化能力的一个组成部分。受访者指出了基于能力的灵性关怀教育、实践培训以及保持灵性关怀教育与临床实践之间联系的重要性。需要进一步阐述灵性关怀核心能力、教学和绩效评估方法的具体内容。