Huri Gazi, Hyun Yoon Suk, Garbis Nickolas G, McFarland Edward G
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(3):290-7. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.3169.
Treatment of superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions continues to be controversial, but with the development of suture anchors, it has become acceptable to repair these lesions arthroscopically. The aim of this study was to review recent trends in the evaluation and treatment of SLAP lesions, with particular emphasis on comparing the results of biceps tenodesis and SLAP repair.
All English language publications from the PubMed, Cochrane, and SCOPUS databases between 1928 and 2012 on biceps tendon, SLAP lesions, and biceps surgery were reviewed. Literature was reviewed in table form because of the lack of Level 1 studies.
Surgical repair can have complications and may not return overhead athletes to their previous level of activity. Biceps tenodesis has become the preferred primary procedure in non-athletic individuals because of the high failure rate of SLAP repair. In patients with continuing symptoms after SLAP lesion repair, biceps tenodesis offers a more predictable operation than a second repair attempt.
Biceps tenodesis may present a viable treatment option for SLAP repair or for failed SLAP repair in some patients.
上盂唇前后部(SLAP)损伤的治疗仍存在争议,但随着缝合锚钉技术的发展,通过关节镜修复这些损伤已被广泛接受。本研究旨在回顾SLAP损伤评估和治疗的最新趋势,特别着重于比较肱二头肌固定术和SLAP修复术的效果。
回顾了1928年至2012年间来自PubMed、Cochrane和SCOPUS数据库中所有关于肱二头肌肌腱、SLAP损伤及肱二头肌手术的英文出版物。由于缺乏一级研究,文献以表格形式进行回顾。
手术修复可能会出现并发症,并且可能无法使从事过头运动的运动员恢复到之前的活动水平。由于SLAP修复的失败率较高,肱二头肌固定术已成为非运动员人群首选的主要手术方式。对于SLAP损伤修复后仍有症状的患者,肱二头肌固定术比再次修复尝试提供了更可预测的手术效果。
肱二头肌固定术对于某些患者的SLAP修复或SLAP修复失败可能是一种可行的治疗选择。