Washburn Erin E, Cohen Sarah L, Manoucheri Elmira, Zurawin Robert K, Einarsson Jon I
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1067-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
To compare differences in trends in reported surgical experience of residents in obstetrics and gynecology in the United States insofar as abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Retrospective analysis of the national case log reports from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for obstetrics and gynecology cases logged as "surgeon" from 2002 to 2012 (Canadian Task Force classification III).
AGCME-accredited residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology.
Eleven thousand five hundred and eight graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology (n = 11 508).
Since 2008, when the ACGME began reporting the 4-year cumulative hysterectomy case load statistics for graduating residents in obstetrics and gynecology, there has been no significant change in the mean (SD) number of hysterectomies performed by residents from 118.1 (38.0) cases in 2008-2009 to 116.1 (31.0) cases in 2011-2012 (p = .16; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.78 to 4.78). During the past decade, however, the total number of reported abdominal hysterectomies consistently decreased from 89.1 (34.2) cases in 2002-2003 to 59.1 (21.0) cases in 2011-2012 (28% decrease; p <.001; 95% CI, 27.7-32.3). The number of vaginal hysterectomies also trended down from 34.9 (19.2) cases to 19.4 (9.0) cases (40% decrease; p <.001; 95% CI, 14.3-16.7). The ACGME did not report the number of laparoscopic hysterectomies performed by residents until 2008-2009, when residents reported performing 23.4 (17.0) cases. From 2008 to 2012, this number increased to 38.5 (20.0) cases (72% increase; p <.001; 95% CI, 13.6-16.6). The proportion of reported laparoscopic hysterectomies performed with robotic assistance was not separately reported.
Although the overall number of hysterectomies reported by residents has remained stable since 2008, the predominant modes of hysterectomy during the past decade have changed substantially, with laparoscopic hysterectomy comprising an increasingly large proportion of resident experience. As laparoscopic hysterectomy has become more common, reported cases of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies have decreased. Additional statistics on the percentage of laparoscopic hysterectomies performed using robotic assistance would be valuable to additionally analyze the effect of this new technology on resident training.
比较美国妇产科住院医师在腹部、阴道和腹腔镜子宫切除术方面报告的手术经验趋势差异。
对毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)2002年至2012年登记为“外科医生”的妇产科病例的全国病例日志报告进行回顾性分析(加拿大工作组分类III)。
ACGME认可的妇产科住院医师培训项目。
11508名妇产科毕业住院医师(n = 11508)。
自2008年ACGME开始报告妇产科毕业住院医师4年累计子宫切除术病例数统计以来,住院医师实施的子宫切除术平均(标准差)数量无显著变化,从2008 - 2009年的118.1(38.0)例降至2011 - 2012年的116.1(31.0)例(p = 0.16;95%置信区间[CI],-0.78至4.78)。然而,在过去十年中,报告的腹部子宫切除术总数持续下降,从2002 - 2003年的89.1(34.2)例降至2011 - 2012年的59.1(21.0)例(下降28%;p < 0.001;95% CI,27.7 - 32.3)。阴道子宫切除术数量也呈下降趋势,从34.9(19.2)例降至19.4(9.0)例(下降40%;p < 0.001;95% CI,14.3 - 16.7)。ACGME直到2008 - 2009年才报告住院医师实施腹腔镜子宫切除术的数量,当时住院医师报告实施了23.4(17.0)例。从2008年到2012年,这一数字增加到38.5(20.0)例(增加72%;p < 0.001;95% CI,13.6 - 16.6)。使用机器人辅助进行的腹腔镜子宫切除术的报告比例未单独报告。
尽管自2008年以来住院医师报告的子宫切除术总数保持稳定,但在过去十年中子宫切除术的主要方式发生了显著变化,腹腔镜子宫切除术在住院医师经验中所占比例越来越大。随着腹腔镜子宫切除术变得更加普遍,报告的腹部和阴道子宫切除术病例有所减少。关于使用机器人辅助进行的腹腔镜子宫切除术百分比的更多统计数据对于进一步分析这项新技术对住院医师培训的影响将是有价值的。