Tuthill Mark H, Montinaro Antonella, Zinngrebe Julia, Prieske Katharina, Draber Peter, Prieske Stefan, Newsom-Davis Tom, von Karstedt Silvia, Graves Jonathan, Walczak Henning
Tumour Immunology Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.
MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Oncogene. 2015 Apr 16;34(16):2138-2144. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.156. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis in cancer cells while sparing normal tissues. Despite promising preclinical results, few patients responded to treatment with recombinant TRAIL (Apo2L/Dulanermin) or TRAIL-R2-specific antibodies, such as conatumumab (AMG655). It is unknown whether this was due to intrinsic TRAIL resistance within primary human cancers or insufficient agonistic activity of the TRAIL-receptor (TRAIL-R)-targeting drugs. Fcγ receptors (FcγR)-mediated crosslinking increases the cancer-cell-killing activity of TRAIL-R2-specific antibodies in vivo. We tested this phenomenon using FcγR-expressing immune cells from patients with ovarian cancer. However, even in the presence of high numbers of FcγR-expressing immune cells, as found in ovarian cancer ascites, AMG655-induced apoptosis was not enabled to any significant degree, indicating that this concept may not translate into clinical use. On the basis of these results, we next set out to determine whether AMG655 possibly interferes with apoptosis induction by endogenous TRAIL, which could be expressed by immune cells. To do so, we tested how AMG655 affected apoptosis induction by recombinant TRAIL. This, however, resulted in the surprising discovery of a striking synergy between AMG655 and non-tagged TRAIL (Apo2L/TRAIL) in killing cancer cells. This combination was as effective in killing cancer cells as highly active recombinant isoleucine-zipper-tagged TRAIL (iz-TRAIL). The increased killing efficiency was due to enhanced formation of the TRAIL death-inducing signalling complex, enabled by concomitant binding of Apo2L/TRAIL and AMG655 to TRAIL-R2. The synergy of AMG655 with Apo2L/TRAIL extended to primary ovarian cancer cells and was further enhanced by combination with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib or a second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspases (SMAC) mimetic. Importantly, primary human hepatocytes were not killed by the AMG655-Apo2L/TRAIL combination, also not when further combined with bortezomib or a SMAC mimetic. We therefore propose that clinical-grade non-tagged recombinant forms of TRAIL, such as dulanermin, could be combined with antibodies such as AMG655 to introduce a highly active TRAIL-R2-agonistic therapy into the cancer clinic.
肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)可诱导癌细胞凋亡,同时不损伤正常组织。尽管临床前研究结果令人鼓舞,但很少有患者对重组TRAIL(Apo2L/杜拉明)或TRAIL-R2特异性抗体(如考那单抗(AMG655))治疗有反应。尚不清楚这是由于原发性人类癌症内在的TRAIL耐药性,还是靶向TRAIL受体(TRAIL-R)的药物激动活性不足。Fcγ受体(FcγR)介导的交联可增强TRAIL-R2特异性抗体在体内的癌细胞杀伤活性。我们使用卵巢癌患者表达FcγR的免疫细胞测试了这一现象。然而,即使存在大量表达FcγR的免疫细胞,如在卵巢癌腹水中所见,AMG655诱导的凋亡也未在任何显著程度上得以实现,这表明这一概念可能无法转化为临床应用。基于这些结果,我们接下来着手确定AMG655是否可能干扰内源性TRAIL诱导的凋亡,内源性TRAIL可能由免疫细胞表达。为此,我们测试了AMG655如何影响重组TRAIL诱导的凋亡。然而,这却意外地发现AMG655与无标签的TRAIL(Apo2L/TRAIL)在杀伤癌细胞方面具有显著的协同作用。这种组合在杀伤癌细胞方面与高活性的重组异亮氨酸拉链标签TRAIL(iz-TRAIL)一样有效。杀伤效率的提高归因于TRAIL死亡诱导信号复合物形成的增强,这是由Apo2L/TRAIL和AMG655同时与TRAIL-R2结合所促成的。AMG655与Apo2L/TRAIL的协同作用扩展至原发性卵巢癌细胞,并且通过与蛋白酶体抑制剂硼替佐米或第二代线粒体衍生的半胱天冬酶激活剂(SMAC)模拟物联合使用而进一步增强。重要的是,原发性人肝细胞不会被AMG655-Apo2L/TRAIL组合杀死,在与硼替佐米或SMAC模拟物进一步联合使用时也不会被杀死。因此,我们建议临床级的无标签重组形式的TRAIL,如杜拉明,可与AMG655等抗体联合使用,将一种高活性的TRAIL-R2激动疗法引入癌症临床治疗。