Suppr超能文献

替考拉宁治疗 6 天与利奈唑胺治疗 10 天治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ESTABLISH-2):一项随机、双盲、III 期、非劣效性试验。

Tedizolid for 6 days versus linezolid for 10 days for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ESTABLISH-2): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine and Division of Infectious Diseases, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, CA, USA.

Clinical Development, Cubist Pharmaceuticals, CA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Aug;14(8):696-705. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70737-6. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New antibiotics are needed to treat infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria. Tedizolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibacterial drug designed to provide enhanced activity against Gram-positive pathogens. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous to oral tedizolid for treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections.

METHODS

ESTABLISH-2 was a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done between Sept 28, 2011, and Jan 10, 2013, at 58 centres in nine countries. Patients (aged ≥12 years) with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (cellulitis or erysipelas, major cutaneous abscess, or wound infection) that had a minimum lesion area of 75 cm(2) and were suspected or documented to be associated with a Gram-positive pathogen, were randomly assigned (1:1), via an interactive voice-response system with block randomisation, to receive intravenous once-daily tedizolid (200 mg for 6 days) or twice-daily linezolid (600 mg for 10 days), with optional oral step-down. Randomisation was stratified by geographic region and type of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection. The primary endpoint was early clinical response (≥20% reduction in lesion area at 48-72 h compared with baseline), with a non-inferiority margin of -10%. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01421511.

FINDINGS

666 patients were randomly assigned to receive tedizolid (n=332) or linezolid (n=334). 283 (85%) patients in the tedizolid group and 276 (83%) in the linezolid group achieved early clinical response (difference 2·6%, 95% CI -3·0 to 8·2), meeting the prespecified non-inferiority margin. Gastrointestinal adverse events were less frequent with tedizolid than linezolid, taking place in 52 (16%) of 331 patients and 67 (20%) of 327 patients in the safety population. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation of study drug were reported by one (<1%) patient in the tedizolid group and four (1%) patients in the linezolid group.

INTERPRETATION

Intravenous to oral once-daily tedizolid 200 mg for 6 days was non-inferior to twice-daily linezolid 600 mg for 10 days for treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. Tedizolid could become a useful option for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in the hospital and outpatient settings.

FUNDING

Cubist Pharmaceuticals.

摘要

背景

需要新的抗生素来治疗耐药菌引起的感染。替加环素是一种新型恶唑烷酮类抗菌药物,旨在提高对革兰氏阳性病原体的活性。我们旨在评估静脉注射到口服替加环素治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

ESTABLISH-2 是一项随机、双盲、III 期、非劣效性试验,于 2011 年 9 月 28 日至 2013 年 1 月 10 日在九个国家的 58 个中心进行。患有急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(蜂窝织炎或丹毒、大皮肤脓肿或伤口感染)的患者(年龄≥12 岁),最小病变面积≥75cm²,疑似或有记录与革兰氏阳性病原体有关,通过具有块随机化的交互式语音响应系统以 1:1 的比例随机分配,接受静脉注射每日一次替加环素(6 天 200mg)或每日两次利奈唑胺(10 天 600mg),可选择口服降阶梯治疗。随机分组按地理区域和急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染类型分层。主要终点是早期临床反应(与基线相比,48-72 小时病变面积减少≥20%),非劣效性边界为-10%。分析采用意向治疗。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01421511。

结果

666 名患者被随机分配接受替加环素(n=332)或利奈唑胺(n=334)治疗。替加环素组 283 名(85%)患者和利奈唑胺组 276 名(83%)患者达到早期临床反应(差异 2.6%,95%CI-3.0 至 8.2),符合预设的非劣效性边界。替加环素组胃肠道不良事件的发生率低于利奈唑胺组,替加环素组有 331 名患者中的 52 名(16%)和利奈唑胺组 327 名患者中的 67 名(20%)发生胃肠道不良事件。在安全性人群中,有 1 名(<1%)替加环素组患者和 4 名(1%)利奈唑胺组患者因治疗出现的不良事件而停止使用研究药物。

结论

静脉注射每日一次替加环素 200mg 治疗 6 天与每日两次利奈唑胺 600mg 治疗 10 天相比,用于治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染,非劣效。替加环素可能成为治疗医院和门诊环境中急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的有效选择。

资金来源

Cubist 制药公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验