Lu Yu, Qin Xue, Li Shan, Zhang Xiaolian, He Yu, Peng Qiliu, Deng Yan, Wang Jian, Xie Li, Li Taijie, Zeng Zhiyu
Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Department of Geriatrics, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Aug 15;343(1-2):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.05.033. Epub 2014 May 26.
CYP2D6 gene encoding CYP2D6 enzyme belonging to the cytochrome P450 system has aroused long attention being a candidate gene for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the results remain inconsistent and underpowered.
To investigate the contradictory results, the effect of single CYP2D6 polymorphism- CYP2D6*4, together with CYP2D6 phenotypes on the risk of AD, was evaluated using a meta-analysis.
Electronic database search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library was conducted up to Apr 17, 2014. Odds ratio (OR) along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed to examine the impact of CYP2D6 variants on different ethnic. Meta-regression was performed to explore possible source of heterogeneity.
A total of 11 studies involving 643AD cases and 1375 controls were included for CYP2D64 polymorphism, and 4 studies consisted of 411AD cases and 603 controls were included for CYP2D6 phenotypes. With respect to CYP2D64 polymorphism, significantly increased risk of AD was found in allelic contrast model of A vs. G (OR=1.29, 95%CI=1.03-1.62, P=0.026), co-dominant genetic model AA vs. GG (OR=1.91, 95%CI=1.04-3.51, P=0.038); and recessive genetic model AA vs. AG+GG (OR=1.88, 95%CI=1.03-3.46, P=0.041) in the overall populations. Similar results were also indicated in subgroup analysis in Caucasians. As for CYP2D6 phenotypes, no significant association with AD was revealed.
Our data support that the CYP2D6*4 polymorphism but not CYP2D6 phenotypes might be associated with increased AD risk, particularly in Caucasian populations.
编码属于细胞色素P450系统的CYP2D6酶的CYP2D6基因作为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的候选基因已引起长期关注,但结果仍不一致且证据不足。
为研究相互矛盾的结果,采用荟萃分析评估单个CYP2D6多态性——CYP2D6*4以及CYP2D6表型对AD风险的影响。
截至2014年4月17日,对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行电子数据库检索。计算比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。进行亚组分析以检验CYP2D6变体对不同种族的影响。进行Meta回归以探索异质性的可能来源。
共有11项研究涉及643例AD病例和1375例对照纳入CYP2D64多态性分析,4项研究包括411例AD病例和603例对照纳入CYP2D6表型分析。关于CYP2D64多态性,在总体人群中,等位基因对比模型A与G对比(OR=1.29,95%CI=1.03 - 1.62,P=0.026)、共显性遗传模型AA与GG对比(OR=1.91,95%CI=1.04 - 3.51,P=0.038)以及隐性遗传模型AA与AG + GG对比(OR=1.88,95%CI=1.03 - 3.46,P=0.041)中发现AD风险显著增加。在白种人的亚组分析中也显示了类似结果。至于CYP2D6表型,未发现与AD有显著关联。
我们的数据支持CYP2D6*4多态性而非CYP2D6表型可能与AD风险增加相关,尤其是在白种人群体中。