Department of Psychology, University of Houston and The Menninger Clinic, Houston, Texas.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 May;75(5):e457-64. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08696.
The goal of this study was to carry out the first comprehensive assessment of psychiatric comorbidity in adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD) compared to a psychiatric comparison group without BPD. Complex comorbidity (a hallmark feature of adult BPD and defined as having any mood or anxiety disorder plus a disorder of impulsivity) was also examined as a distinguishing feature of adolescent BPD.
Consecutively admitted patients (October 2008 to October 2012) to an inpatient psychiatric hospital received parental consent and gave assent for participation in the study (N = 418), with the final sample after exclusions consisting of 335 adolescent inpatients. A comprehensive, multimethod approach to determining psychiatric comorbidity was used, including both an interview-based (categorical) and a questionnaire-based (dimensional) assessment as well as both parent and adolescent self-report. Measures included the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (NIMH-DISC-IV), Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Youth Self-Report (YSR), Car, Relax Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT), and the Childhood Interview for DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder (CI-BPD).
Thirty-three percent of the final sample met criteria for BPD. Adolescent inpatients with BPD showed significantly higher rates of psychiatric comorbidity compared to non-BPD psychiatric subjects for both internalizing (χ²₁ = 27.40, P < .001) and externalizing (χ²₁ = 19.02, P < .001) diagnosis. Similarly, using dimensional scores for self-reported symptoms, adolescent inpatients with BPD had significantly higher rates of psychiatric comorbidity compared to non-BPD subjects for internalizing (t₃₂₉ = -6.63, P < .001) and externalizing (t₃₂₉ = -7.14, P < .001) problems. Parent-reported symptoms were significantly higher in the BPD group only when using a dimensional approach (internalizing: t₃₂₁ = -3.42, P < .001; externalizing: t₃₂₁ = -3.32, P < .001). Furthermore, significantly higher rates of complex comorbidity were found for adolescents with BPD (χ²₁ = 26.60, P < .001). Moreover, externalizing and internalizing problems interacted in association with borderline traits (B = .25; P < .001).
Similar to findings in adult studies of BPD, adolescents with BPD demonstrate significantly more complex comorbidity compared to psychiatric subjects without BPD.
本研究的目的是首次全面评估符合 DSM-IV 边缘型人格障碍 (BPD) 标准的青少年 (12-17 岁) 的精神共病情况,并与无 BPD 的精神病对照人群进行比较。还检查了复杂共病 (成人 BPD 的一个显著特征,定义为患有任何心境或焦虑障碍加冲动障碍),作为青少年 BPD 的一个鉴别特征。
2008 年 10 月至 2012 年 10 月连续入院的住院精神病患者获得了父母的同意,并同意参加研究 (N = 418),排除后最终样本包括 335 名青少年住院患者。使用一种综合的、多方法的方法来确定精神共病,包括基于访谈的 (分类) 和基于问卷的 (维度) 评估,以及父母和青少年的自我报告。测量包括儿童诊断访谈表 (NIMH-DISC-IV)、儿童行为检查表 (CBCL)、青少年自我报告 (YSR)、Car、Relax Alone、Forget、Friends、Trouble (CRAFFT) 和儿童期 DSM-IV 边缘型人格障碍访谈 (CI-BPD)。
最终样本中有 33%符合 BPD 标准。与非 BPD 精神病患者相比,患有 BPD 的青少年住院患者的精神共病率显著更高,无论是内化症 (χ²₁ = 27.40, P <.001) 还是外化症 (χ²₁ = 19.02, P <.001)。同样,使用自我报告症状的维度评分,与非 BPD 患者相比,患有 BPD 的青少年住院患者的内化症 (t₃₂₉ = -6.63, P <.001) 和外化症 (t₃₂₉ = -7.14, P <.001) 问题的精神共病率显著更高。仅当使用维度方法时,父母报告的症状在 BPD 组中才显著更高(内化症:t₃₂₁ = -3.42, P <.001;外化症:t₃₂₁ = -3.32, P <.001)。此外,患有 BPD 的青少年的复杂共病率显著更高 (χ²₁ = 26.60, P <.001)。此外,边缘特征与外显和内隐问题相互作用 (B =.25;P <.001)。
与成人 BPD 研究中的发现类似,患有 BPD 的青少年与无 BPD 的精神病患者相比,表现出明显更多的复杂共病。