Beymer Matthew R, Weiss Robert E, Bolan Robert K, Rudy Ellen T, Bourque Linda B, Rodriguez Jeffrey P, Morisky Donald E
L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center, Los Angeles, California, USA Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Sex Transm Infect. 2014 Nov;90(7):567-72. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051494. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
Geosocial networking applications (GSN apps) used for meeting sexual partners have become increasingly popular with men who have sex with men (MSM) since 2009. The current study aimed to determine if self-identified HIV-negative, MSM clinic attendees who used GSN apps have an increased incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) compared to self-identified HIV-negative, MSM attendees who met sexual partners via in-person venues, such as bars or clubs or through MSM-specific hook-up websites.
Data were collected between August 2011 and January 2013 on all self-identified HIV-negative, MSM clients visiting the L.A. Gay & Lesbian Center for STI screening. A total of 7184 individuals tested for STIs and self-reported behaviours on drug use and social networking methods to meet sexual partners. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyse the results.
Individuals who used GSN apps for meeting sexual partners had greater odds of testing positive for gonorrhoea (OR: 1.25; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.48) and for chlamydia (OR: 1.37; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.65) compared to individuals who met partners through in-person methods only. There were no significant differences in syphilis and HIV incidence between those who met partners via in-person venues only, on the internet or through GSN apps.
The present study concludes that sexual health clinic MSM attendees who are meeting on GSN apps are at greater risk for gonorrhoea and chlamydia than MSM attendees who meet in-person or on the internet. Future interventions should explore the use of these novel technologies for testing promotion, prevention and education.
自2009年以来,用于寻找性伴侣的地理社交网络应用程序(GSN应用程序)在男男性行为者(MSM)中越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在确定,与通过亲自前往酒吧或俱乐部等场所或通过MSM特定的搭讪网站结识性伴侣的自我认定为HIV阴性的MSM门诊患者相比,使用GSN应用程序的自我认定为HIV阴性的MSM门诊患者性传播感染(STI)的发病率是否更高。
2011年8月至2013年1月期间,收集了所有前往洛杉矶同性恋中心进行STI筛查的自我认定为HIV阴性的MSM客户的数据。共有7184人接受了STI检测,并自我报告了吸毒行为以及通过社交网络寻找性伴侣的方式。使用多变量逻辑回归模型分析结果。
与仅通过亲自见面方式结识性伴侣的个体相比,使用GSN应用程序寻找性伴侣的个体淋病检测呈阳性(比值比:1.25;95%置信区间1.06至1.48)和衣原体检测呈阳性(比值比:1.37;95%置信区间1.13至1.65)的几率更高。仅通过亲自前往场所、通过互联网或通过GSN应用程序结识性伴侣的个体之间,梅毒和HIV发病率没有显著差异。
本研究得出结论,在GSN应用程序上结识性伴侣的性健康诊所MSM就诊者,比通过亲自见面或通过互联网结识性伴侣的MSM就诊者感染淋病和衣原体的风险更高。未来的干预措施应探索如何利用这些新技术进行检测推广、预防和教育。