Burdino Elisa, Ruggiero Tina, Proietti Alex, Milia Maria Grazia, Olivero Antonella, Caviglia Gian Paolo, Marietti Milena, Rizzetto Mario, Smedile Antonina, Ghisetti Valeria
Laboratory of Microbiology and Virology, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Torino, Italy.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
J Clin Virol. 2014 Aug;60(4):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
Recent technologic innovations allow for quantitative assessment of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in serum; this has been used to monitor the course of chronic HBV hepatitis (CHB) and predict treatment response. LIAISON-XL Murex HBsAg Quant assay (DiaSorin, Saluggia, I) is the newest immunoassay CE approved to quantify HBsAg.
To compare LIAISON-XL performances with ARCHITECT-QT HBsAg (Abbott Diagnostics, IL, USA), as reference test.
Sequential serum samples (n=152) from 14 HBe-negative patients with CHB, the majority of them infected by HBV genotype D undergoing antiviral treatment, were retrospectively tested with both assays. The 2nd WHO Standard 00/588 for HBsAg was used as reference.
LIAISON-XL and ARCHITECT-QT correlated by r=0.95, p<0.0001; by Bland-Altman analysis agreement of mean difference was 0.21 ± 0.15 log 10 IU/mL, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.5). Performance of LIAISON-XL against the 2nd WHO Standard was r=0.998, p<0.0001 (95% CI: 0.993-0.999) with results nearer to the expected WHO values compared to ARCHITECT-QT. Median baseline HBsAg level was similar with the two methods before antiviral treatment, throughout fluctuations of HBsAg level in treatment non-responders and during the decrease of HBsAg titer in treatment responders. Correlation between HBsAg levels and HBV DNA was statistically significant for both the two immunoassays (LIAISON-XL: r=0.4988, 95% CI: 0.3452-0.6264, p<0.0001; ARCHITECT-QT: r=0.480, 95% CI: 0.3233-0.6111, p<0.0001).
Correlation between HBsAg measurement with LIAISON-XL and ARCHITECT-QT was high. LIAISON-XL accurately quantified HBsAg in clinical samples at baseline or during antiviral therapy; it can be applied for HBsAg quantification in clinical practice and decision making in CHB.
近期的技术创新使得对血清中乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)水平进行定量评估成为可能;这已被用于监测慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)的病程并预测治疗反应。LIAISON-XL Murex HBsAg定量检测法(索林集团,萨卢贾,意大利)是最新一款获得CE认证的用于定量检测HBsAg的免疫分析法。
将LIAISON-XL检测法的性能与作为参比检测法的ARCHITECT-QT HBsAg检测法(美国雅培诊断公司,伊利诺伊州)进行比较。
对14例HBe阴性慢性乙型肝炎患者的连续血清样本(n=152)进行回顾性检测,这些患者大多感染了D型乙肝病毒且正在接受抗病毒治疗,两种检测法都用于检测这些样本。采用世界卫生组织第二代HBsAg标准品00/588作为参比。
LIAISON-XL与ARCHITECT-QT的相关性为r=0.95,p<0.0001;通过布兰德-奥特曼分析,平均差异的一致性为0.21±0.15 log10 IU/mL,95%置信区间:-0.07至0.5)。LIAISON-XL相对于世界卫生组织第二代标准品的性能为r=0.998,p<0.0001(95%置信区间:0.993-0.999),与ARCHITECT-QT相比,其结果更接近世界卫生组织预期值。在抗病毒治疗前两种方法测得的基线HBsAg水平中位数相似,在治疗无反应者的HBsAg水平波动期间以及治疗有反应者的HBsAg滴度下降期间也相似。两种免疫分析法检测的HBsAg水平与HBV DNA之间的相关性均具有统计学意义(LIAISON-XL:r=0.4988,95%置信区间:0.3452-0.6264,p<0.0001;ARCHITECT-QT:r=0.480,95%置信区间:0.3233-0.6111,p<0.0001)。
LIAISON-XL与ARCHITECT-QT检测HBsAg的相关性很高。LIAISON-XL能够准确地对临床样本在基线期或抗病毒治疗期间的HBsAg进行定量;它可应用于慢性乙型肝炎临床实践中的HBsAg定量及决策制定。