McCarthy Michael J, Liang Sherri, Spadoni Andrea D, Kelsoe John R, Simmons Alan N
Research Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e100204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100204. eCollection 2014.
Studies of bipolar disorder (BD) suggest a genetic basis of the illness that alters brain function and morphology. In recent years, a number of genetic variants associated with BD have been identified. However, little is known about the associated genes, or brain circuits that rely upon their function. Using an anatomically comprehensive survey of the human transcriptome (The Allen Brain Atlas), we mapped the expression of 58 genes with suspected involvement in BD based upon their relationship to SNPs identified in genome wide association studies (GWAS). We then conducted a meta-analysis of structural MRI studies to identify brain regions that are abnormal in BD. Of 58 BD associated genes, 22 had anatomically distinct expression patterns that could be categorized into one of three clusters (C1-C3). Brain regions with the highest and lowest expression of these genes did not overlap strongly with anatomical sites identified as abnormal by structural MRI except in the parahippocampal gyrus, the inferior/superior temporal gyrus and the cerebellar vermis, regions where overlap was significant. Using the 22 genes in C1-C3 as reference points, additional genes with correlated expression patterns were identified and organized into sets based on similarity. Further analysis revealed that five of these gene sets were significantly associated with BD, suggesting that anatomical expression profile is correlated with genetic susceptibility to BD, particularly for genes in C2. Our data suggest that expression profiles of BD-associated genes do not explain the majority of structural abnormalities observed in BD, but may be useful in identifying new candidate genes. Our results highlight the complex neuroanatomical basis of BD, and reinforce illness models that emphasize impaired brain connectivity.
双相情感障碍(BD)的研究表明,该疾病存在改变脑功能和形态的遗传基础。近年来,已鉴定出一些与BD相关的基因变异。然而,对于相关基因或依赖其功能的脑回路却知之甚少。我们利用对人类转录组进行的解剖学全面调查(艾伦脑图谱),根据58个基因与全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中鉴定出的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的关系,绘制了这些疑似与BD相关的基因的表达图谱。然后,我们对结构磁共振成像(MRI)研究进行了荟萃分析,以确定BD中异常的脑区。在58个与BD相关的基因中,22个具有解剖学上不同的表达模式,可分为三个簇(C1 - C3)之一。这些基因表达最高和最低的脑区,除了在海马旁回、颞上/下回和小脑蚓部这些重叠显著的区域外,与结构MRI确定为异常的解剖部位并没有强烈重叠。以C1 - C3中的22个基因作为参考点,鉴定出具有相关表达模式的其他基因,并根据相似性将它们组织成集合。进一步分析表明,其中五个基因集与BD显著相关,这表明解剖学表达谱与BD的遗传易感性相关,特别是对于C2中的基因。我们的数据表明,BD相关基因的表达谱并不能解释BD中观察到的大多数结构异常,但可能有助于识别新的候选基因。我们的结果突出了BD复杂的神经解剖学基础,并强化了强调脑连接受损的疾病模型。