1Avignon University, Avignon, FRANCE; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the NETHERLANDS; 3Applied Biology Department, Institute of Bioengineering, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, SPAIN; 4Department of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; 5Department of Child Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; 6Dalton Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO; and 7School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, CANADA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Nov;46(11):2148-58. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000341.
Controversy exists on whether endothelial function is enhanced in athletes. We sought to systematically review the literature and determine whether endothelial function, as assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD), is greater in athletes across all ages relative to that in their age-matched counterparts.
We conducted a systematic search on MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science since their inceptions until July 2013 for articles evaluating FMD in athletes. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the standardized mean difference (SMD) in FMD of the brachial artery between athletes and age-matched control subjects. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to identify sources of heterogeneity.
Twenty-one articles were included in this analysis, comprising 530 athletes (452 endurance trained, 49 strength trained, and 29 endurance and strength trained) and 376 control subjects. After data pooling, FMD was higher in athletes than that in control groups (SMD, 0.48; P = 0.008). In subgroup analyses, young athletes (<40 yr) presented increased baseline brachial artery diameter (mean difference, 0.40 mm; P < 0.00001) and similar FMD (SMD, 0.27; P = 0.22) compared with those in controls. In contrast, master athletes (>;50 yr) showed similar baseline brachial artery diameter (mean difference, 0.04 mm; P = 0.69) and increased FMD (SMD, 0.99; P = 0.0005) compared with those in controls.
The current meta-analysis provides evidence that master athletes but not young athletes exhibit greater FMD compared with that in age-matched healthy controls, thus suggesting that the association between high levels of exercise training and increased FMD is age dependent.
关于运动员的内皮功能是否增强存在争议。我们试图系统地回顾文献,并确定无论从年龄匹配的对照组相比,运动员的内皮功能(通过血流介导的扩张(FMD)评估)是否在所有年龄段都更高。
我们对 MEDLINE、Cochrane、Scopus 和 Web of Science 进行了系统检索,自成立以来检索到 2013 年 7 月的所有文章,以评估运动员的 FMD。对肱动脉 FMD 的运动员与年龄匹配的对照组之间的标准化均数差(SMD)进行了荟萃分析。采用亚组分析和 meta 回归来确定异质性的来源。
本分析共纳入 21 篇文章,包括 530 名运动员(452 名耐力训练,49 名力量训练,29 名耐力和力量训练)和 376 名对照组。数据汇总后,运动员的 FMD 高于对照组(SMD,0.48;P = 0.008)。在亚组分析中,年轻运动员(<40 岁)的基线肱动脉直径增加(平均差异,0.40mm;P < 0.00001),与对照组相比,FMD 相似(SMD,0.27;P = 0.22)。相比之下,大师运动员(>50 岁)的基线肱动脉直径相似(平均差异,0.04mm;P = 0.69),FMD 增加(SMD,0.99;P = 0.0005)与对照组相比。
本荟萃分析提供了证据表明,与年龄匹配的健康对照组相比,大师运动员而不是年轻运动员表现出更大的 FMD,因此表明高水平的运动训练与 FMD 增加之间的关联是年龄依赖性的。