• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为循证实践提供信息:对分析成人保护服务数据的研究综述

Informing evidence-based practice: a review of research analyzing adult protective services data.

作者信息

Ernst Joy Swanson, Ramsey-Klawsnik Holly, Schillerstrom Jason E, Dayton Carol, Mixson Paula, Counihan Mary

机构信息

a Department of Sociology and Social Work , Hood College , Frederick , Maryland , USA.

出版信息

J Elder Abuse Negl. 2014;26(5):458-94. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2013.832605.

DOI:10.1080/08946566.2013.832605
PMID:24965804
Abstract

The mission of Adult Protective Services (APS) is to protect older and vulnerable adults from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The complexity of APS cases and the potential for life-changing interventions point to the need for research that examines and evaluates APS practices. A literature review identified 50 studies published during a 16-year period that used APS agencies, clients, data, or resources to test hypotheses regarding elder abuse. The analysis revealed promising efforts toward knowledge development about elder mistreatment and self-neglect. This article provides an overview of salient findings, notes the scarcity of studies that analyze the effectiveness of APS, and highlights the need for additional research. Lessons learned are described, and APS practitioners and researchers are urged to work collaboratively to develop key practice-related questions about APS processes and outcomes that can be tested with appropriate research methodologies.

摘要

成人保护服务(APS)的使命是保护老年人和弱势成年人免受虐待、忽视和剥削。APS案件的复杂性以及改变生活的干预措施的可能性表明,需要开展研究来审视和评估APS的做法。一项文献综述发现,在16年期间发表了50项研究,这些研究利用APS机构、客户、数据或资源来检验关于虐待老年人的假设。分析揭示了在老年人虐待和自我忽视知识发展方面的积极努力。本文概述了主要研究结果,指出分析APS有效性的研究稀缺,并强调了进一步研究的必要性。文中描述了所吸取的经验教训,并敦促APS从业者和研究人员合作,提出与APS流程和结果相关的关键实践问题,这些问题可用适当的研究方法进行检验。

相似文献

1
Informing evidence-based practice: a review of research analyzing adult protective services data.为循证实践提供信息:对分析成人保护服务数据的研究综述
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2014;26(5):458-94. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2013.832605.
2
Examining Adult Protective Services Outcomes: Services Associated With the Decrease of Mistreatment Differed by Elder Mistreatment Type.审查成人保护服务的结果:与虐待减少相关的服务因虐待类型而异。
Gerontologist. 2022 Oct 19;62(9):1359-1368. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac040.
3
Elder mistreatment reporting: differences in the threshold of reporting between hospice and palliative care professionals and adult protective service.老年人虐待报告:临终关怀与姑息治疗专业人员和成人保护服务机构在报告阈值上的差异。
J Palliat Med. 2009 Jan;12(1):64-70. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2008.0173.
4
Reporting elder mistreatment.报告老年人虐待情况。
J Gerontol Nurs. 1997 Jul;23(7):24-32. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-19970701-10.
5
A Novel Intervention to Identify and Report Suspected Abuse in Older, Primary Care Patients.一种识别和报告老年初级保健患者疑似虐待的新干预措施。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1748-1754. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16433. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Interventions from home-based geriatric assessments of adult protective service clients suffering elder mistreatment.对遭受虐待的成年保护服务对象进行居家老年评估后的干预措施。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Sep;53(9):1538-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53469.x.
7
Effect of an elder abuse and self-neglect intervention on repeat investigations by adult protective services: RISE project.老年虐待和自我忽视干预对成人保护服务重复调查的影响:RISE 项目。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Nov;71(11):3403-3412. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18506. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
Development of short-form measures to assess four types of elder mistreatment: Findings from an evidence-based study of APS elder abuse substantiation decisions.用于评估四种类型老年人虐待情况的简表测量方法的开发:基于成人保护服务机构老年人虐待证实决定的证据研究结果
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug-Oct;29(4):229-253. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2017.1338171. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
9
Community approaches to elder abuse.应对老年人虐待的社区方法。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2005 May;21(2):429-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2004.10.007.
10
Using administrative data from adult protective services: opportunities and considerations.利用成人保护服务的行政数据:机遇与考量
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2022 Jan-Feb;34(1):77-92. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2021.2020700. Epub 2022 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
RISE: A Conceptual Model of Integrated and Restorative Elder Abuse Intervention.RISE:一种综合和恢复性虐待老年人干预的概念模型。
Gerontologist. 2023 Jul 18;63(6):966-973. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac083.
2
Examining Adult Protective Services Outcomes: Services Associated With the Decrease of Mistreatment Differed by Elder Mistreatment Type.审查成人保护服务的结果:与虐待减少相关的服务因虐待类型而异。
Gerontologist. 2022 Oct 19;62(9):1359-1368. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac040.
3
Service providers' use of harm reduction approaches in working with older adults experiencing abuse: a qualitative study.
服务提供者在为受虐待的老年人提供服务时使用减少伤害方法的情况:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02328-1.
4
Developing a comprehensive understanding of elder abuse prevention in immigrant communities: a comparative mixed methods study protocol.制定综合性的移民社区预防虐待老人方案:一项比较性混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e022736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022736.
5
Development and Spanish translation of the Weinberg Center Risk and Abuse Prevention Screen (WC-RAPS).温伯格中心风险和滥用预防筛查工具(WC-RAPS)的制定与西班牙语翻译。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2019 Jan-Feb;31(1):38-55. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2018.1531099. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
6
Item response theory analysis of the Lichtenberg Financial Decision Screening Scale.利希滕贝格财务决策筛选量表的项目反应理论分析
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2017 Aug-Oct;29(4):213-228. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2017.1338170. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
7
State of the science on prevention of elder abuse and lessons learned from child abuse and domestic violence prevention: Toward a conceptual framework for research.预防虐待老年人的科学现状以及从预防虐待儿童和家庭暴力中吸取的经验教训:构建一个研究概念框架
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2016 Aug-Dec;28(4-5):263-300. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2016.1240053. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
The Sexual Victimization of Older Women Living in Nursing Homes.生活在养老院中的老年女性遭受的性侵害
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2015;27(4-5):392-409. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2015.1082453. Epub 2015 Sep 2.