Gililland Jeremy M, Anderson Lucas A, Barney Jacob K, Ross Hunter L, Pelt Christopher E, Peters Christopher L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City Utah.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9 Suppl):135-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.041. Epub 2014 May 27.
Barbed suture has been associated with improved closure efficiency and safety in TKA in prior studies. We performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial to determine the efficiency and safety of this technology in TKA. We prospectively randomized 411 patients undergoing primary TKA to either barbed running (n=191) or knotted interrupted suture closure (n=203). Closure time was measured intra-operatively. Cost analysis was based on suture and OR time costs. Closure time was shorter with barbed suture (9.8 vs. 14.5 min, p<0.001). Total closure cost was less with barbed suture ($324 vs. $419, p<0.001). Early complications and outcomes were similar between groups. The use of barbed suture in TKA is associated with shorter closure time, lower cost and similar outcomes and complications when compared with standard sutures.
在先前的研究中,倒刺缝线与全膝关节置换术(TKA)中提高缝合效率和安全性相关。我们进行了一项多中心随机对照试验,以确定该技术在TKA中的效率和安全性。我们前瞻性地将411例行初次TKA的患者随机分为倒刺连续缝合组(n = 191)和打结间断缝合组(n = 203)。术中测量缝合时间。成本分析基于缝线和手术室时间成本。倒刺缝线的缝合时间更短(9.8分钟对14.5分钟,p<0.001)。倒刺缝线的总缝合成本更低(324美元对419美元,p<0.001)。两组之间的早期并发症和结果相似。与标准缝线相比,在TKA中使用倒刺缝线可缩短缝合时间、降低成本,且结果和并发症相似。