Blumenfeld Hal, Meador Kimford J
Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A; Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A; Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Epilepsia. 2014 Aug;55(8):1145-50. doi: 10.1111/epi.12588. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
Impaired consciousness has important practical consequences for people living with epilepsy. Recent pathophysiologic studies show that seizures with impaired level of consciousness always affect widespread cortical networks and subcortical arousal systems. In light of these findings and their clinical significance, efforts are underway to revise the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) 2010 report to include impaired consciousness in the classification of seizures. Lüders and colleagues have presented one such effort, which we discuss here. We then propose an alternative classification of impaired consciousness in epilepsy based on functional neuroanatomy. Some seizures involve focal cortical regions and cause selective deficits in the content of consciousness but without impaired overall level of consciousness or awareness. These include focal aware conscious seizures (FACS) with lower order cortical deficits such as somatosensory or visual impairment as well as FACS with higher cognitive deficits including ictal aphasia or isolated epileptic amnesia. Another category applies to seizures with impaired level of consciousness leading to deficits in multiple cognitive domains. For this category, we believe the terms "dyscognitive" or "dialeptic" should be avoided because they may create confusion. Instead we propose that seizures with impaired level of consciousness be described based on underlying pathophysiology. Widespread moderately severe deficits in corticothalamic function are seen in absence seizures and in focal impaired consciousness seizures (FICS), including many temporal lobe seizures and other focal seizures with impaired consciousness. Some simple responses or automatisms may be preserved in these seizures. In contrast, generalized tonic-clonic seizures usually produce widespread severe deficits in corticothalamic function causing loss of all meaningful responses. Further work is needed to understand and prevent impaired consciousness in epilepsy, but the first step is to keep this crucial practical and physiologic aspect of seizures front-and-center in our discussions.
意识障碍对癫痫患者具有重要的实际影响。近期的病理生理学研究表明,伴有意识水平障碍的癫痫发作总是会影响广泛的皮质网络和皮质下觉醒系统。鉴于这些发现及其临床意义,目前正在努力修订国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)2010年的报告,以便在癫痫发作分类中纳入意识障碍。吕德斯及其同事已经提出了这样一项努力,我们在此进行讨论。然后,我们基于功能神经解剖学提出了一种癫痫意识障碍的替代分类方法。一些癫痫发作涉及局灶性皮质区域,并导致意识内容的选择性缺陷,但总体意识水平或觉知并未受损。这些包括伴有较低级皮质缺陷(如躯体感觉或视觉障碍)的局灶性觉知性癫痫发作(FACS),以及伴有较高级认知缺陷(包括发作性失语或孤立性癫痫性遗忘)的FACS。另一类适用于意识水平受损导致多个认知领域出现缺陷的癫痫发作。对于这一类,我们认为应避免使用“认知障碍性”或“双相性”等术语,因为它们可能会造成混淆。相反,我们建议根据潜在的病理生理学来描述意识水平受损的癫痫发作。在失神发作和局灶性意识障碍性癫痫发作(FICS)中可见皮质丘脑功能广泛的中度严重缺陷,包括许多颞叶癫痫发作和其他伴有意识障碍的局灶性癫痫发作。在这些癫痫发作中,一些简单反应或自动症可能会保留下来。相比之下,全身性强直-阵挛性发作通常会导致皮质丘脑功能广泛的严重缺陷,导致所有有意义的反应丧失。需要进一步开展工作来理解和预防癫痫中的意识障碍,但第一步是在我们的讨论中始终将癫痫发作这一关键的实际和生理方面放在首要和核心位置。