Chor Julie, Hill Brandon, Martins Summer, Mistretta Stephanie, Patel Ashlesha, Gilliam Melissa
Section of Family Planning and Contraceptive Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Section of Family Planning and Contraceptive Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;212(1):45.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.052. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of doula support on first-trimester abortion care.
Women were randomized to receive doula support or routine care during first-trimester surgical abortion. We examined the effect of doula support on pain during abortion using a 100 mm visual analog scale. The study had the statistical power to detect a 20% difference in mean pain scores. Secondary measures included satisfaction, procedure duration, and patient recommendations regarding doula support.
Two hundred fourteen women completed the study: 106 received doula support, and 108 received routine care. The groups did not differ regarding demographics, gestational age, or medical history. Pain scores in the doula and control groups did not differ at speculum insertion (38.6 [±26.3 mm] vs 43.6 mm [±25.9 mm], P = .18) or procedure completion (68.2 [±28.0 mm] vs 70.6 mm [±23.5 mm], P = .52). Procedure duration (3.39 [±2.83 min] vs 3.18 min [±2.36 min], P = .55) and patient satisfaction (75.2 [±28.6 mm] vs 74.6 mm [±27.4 mm], P = .89) did not differ between the doula and control groups. Among women who received doula support, 96.2% recommended routine doula support for abortion and 60.4% indicated interest in training as doulas. Among women who did not receive doula support, 71.6% of women would have wanted it. Additional clinical staff was needed to provide support for 2.9% of women in the doula group and 14.7% of controls (P < .01).
Although doula support did not have a measurable effect on pain or satisfaction, women overwhelmingly recommended it for routine care. Women receiving doula support were less likely to require additional clinic support resources. Doula support therefore may address patient psychosocial needs.
本研究的目的是评估导乐支持对孕早期人工流产护理的影响。
在孕早期人工流产期间,将女性随机分为接受导乐支持或常规护理两组。我们使用100毫米视觉模拟量表来检查导乐支持对流产期间疼痛的影响。该研究有统计学效力来检测平均疼痛评分20%的差异。次要指标包括满意度、手术时长以及患者对导乐支持的推荐情况。
214名女性完成了研究:106名接受了导乐支持,108名接受了常规护理。两组在人口统计学特征、孕周或病史方面无差异。在放入窥器时(38.6[±26.3毫米]对43.6毫米[±25.9毫米],P = 0.18)或手术结束时(68.2[±28.0毫米]对70.6毫米[±23.5毫米],P = 0.52),导乐组和对照组的疼痛评分无差异。导乐组和对照组的手术时长(3.39[±2.83分钟]对3.18分钟[±2.36分钟],P = 0.55)和患者满意度(75.2[±28.6毫米]对74.6毫米[±27.4毫米],P = 0.89)无差异。在接受导乐支持的女性中,96.2%推荐在流产时常规使用导乐支持,60.4%表示有兴趣接受导乐培训。在未接受导乐支持的女性中,71.6%的女性表示希望得到导乐支持。导乐组2.9%的女性和对照组14.7%的女性需要额外的临床工作人员提供支持(P < 0.01)。
虽然导乐支持对疼痛或满意度没有可测量的影响,但绝大多数女性推荐将其用于常规护理。接受导乐支持的女性需要额外临床支持资源的可能性较小。因此,导乐支持可能满足患者的心理社会需求。