Suppr超能文献

美国急诊科和医院接受过敏治疗患者中严重过敏反应的风险因素。

Risk factors for severe anaphylaxis in patients receiving anaphylaxis treatment in US emergency departments and hospitals.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

Sanofi US, Bridgewater, NJ.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Nov;134(5):1125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jun 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although reported risk factors for severe anaphylaxis include older age, presence of comorbid medical conditions, and concomitant medications, previous studies have used varying definitions for anaphylaxis and heterogeneous methodology.

OBJECTIVE

To describe risk factors for severe anaphylaxis among US patients treated in emergency departments (EDs) or hospitals for anaphylaxis.

METHODS

Individuals with an ED visit/hospitalization for anaphylaxis were identified from 2 MarketScan Research Databases using an expanded International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code algorithm. Eligibility for the current study required continuous medical and prescription coverage for at least 1 year before and after the index date. Severe anaphylaxis was defined as a reaction requiring hospital admission.

RESULTS

Among 11,972 individuals, 2,622 (22%) had severe anaphylaxis. Unadjusted analysis showed that severe anaphylaxis was associated with older age and higher comorbidity burden. These patients were also less likely to have filled an epinephrine autoinjector (EAI) prescription or visited an allergist/immunologist, but more likely to have had an ED visit/hospitalization (any cause). On multivariable analysis, filling an EAI prescription (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53-0.78) or visiting an allergist/immunologist (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95) before the index event was associated with a lower risk of severe anaphylaxis, while any previous ED visit (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.30) or hospitalization (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.36-1.75) was associated with a higher risk of severe anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort with an ED visit or hospitalization for anaphylaxis, 22% had severe anaphylaxis. Pre-index preventive anaphylaxis care (ie, EAI prescription fill and allergist/immunologist visit) was associated with a significantly lower risk, supporting the benefits of preventive anaphylaxis care in real-world practice.

摘要

背景

尽管已有研究报道,年龄较大、合并基础疾病和同时使用多种药物与严重过敏反应的发生风险相关,但既往研究使用的过敏反应定义和方法学存在差异。

目的

描述美国因过敏反应在急诊科(ED)或医院接受治疗患者的严重过敏反应的危险因素。

方法

使用扩展的国际疾病分类,第九版,临床修正诊断代码算法,从 2 个 MarketScan 研究数据库中确定因过敏反应接受 ED 就诊/住院治疗的个体。本研究的入选标准为在索引日期之前和之后至少 1 年持续有医疗和处方覆盖。严重过敏反应定义为需要住院治疗的反应。

结果

在 11972 名个体中,2622 名(22%)发生严重过敏反应。未校正分析显示,严重过敏反应与年龄较大和更高的合并症负担相关。这些患者更可能未开具肾上腺素自动注射器(EAI)处方或就诊于过敏症/免疫学家,但更可能因任何原因接受 ED 就诊/住院治疗。多变量分析显示,在索引事件前开具 EAI 处方(比值比[OR],0.64;95%CI,0.53-0.78)或就诊于过敏症/免疫学家(OR,0.78;95%CI,0.63-0.95)与严重过敏反应风险降低相关,而任何既往 ED 就诊(OR,1.18;95%CI,1.07-1.30)或住院治疗(OR,1.55;95%CI,1.36-1.75)与严重过敏反应风险增加相关。

结论

在该因过敏反应接受 ED 就诊或住院治疗的大型队列中,22%发生严重过敏反应。索引前预防过敏反应的治疗(即 EAI 处方开具和就诊于过敏症/免疫学家)与显著降低的风险相关,支持在真实世界实践中预防过敏反应治疗的获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验