Suppr超能文献

一种改良的产前生长评估评分,用于使用单一和复合生物测量参数评估孕晚期胎儿生长情况。

A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

作者信息

Deter Russell L, Lee Wesley, Sangi-Haghpeykar Haleh, Tarca Adi L, Yeo Lami, Romero Roberto

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine , Houston, TX , USA .

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 May;28(7):745-54. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.934218. Epub 2014 Jul 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To define modified Prenatal Growth Assessment Scores (mPGAS) for single and composite biometric parameters and determine their reference ranges in normal fetuses.

METHODS

Nine anatomical parameters (ap) were measured and the weight estimated (EWTa, EWTb) in a longitudinal study of 119 fetuses with normal neonatal growth outcomes. Expected third trimester size trajectories, obtained from second trimester Rossavik size models, were used in calculating Percent Deviations (% Dev's) and their age-specific reference ranges in each fetus. The components of individual % Dev's values outside their reference ranges, designated +iapPGAS, -iapPGAS, were averaged to give +apPGAS and -apPGAS values for the 3rd trimester. The +iapPGAS and -iapPGAS values for different combinations of ap (c1a (HC, AC, FDL, ThC, EWTa), c1b (HC, AC, FDL, ThC, EWTb), c2 (ThC, ArmC, AVol, TVol), c3 (HC, AC, FDL, EWTa)) were then averaged to give +icPGAS and -icPGAS values at different time points or at the end of the third trimester (+cPGAS, -cPGAS). Values for iapPGAS, ic1bPGAS, and ic2PGAS were compared to their respective apPGAS or cPGAS reference ranges.

RESULTS

All mPGAS values had one 95% range boundary at 0.0%. Upper boundaries of 1D +apPGAS values ranged from 0.0% (HC) to +0.49% (ThC) and were +0.06%, +2.3% and +1.8% for EWT, AVol and TVol, respectively. Comparable values for -apPGAS were 0.0% (BPD, FDL, HDL), to -0.58% (ArmC), -0.13% (EWT), -0.8% (AVol), and 0.0% (TVol). The +cPGAS, 95% reference range upper boundaries varied from +0.36% (c1b) to +0.89% (c2). Comparable values for -cPGAS lower boundaries were -0.17% (c1b) to -0.43% (c2).

CONCLUSIONS

The original PGAS concept has now been extended to individual biometric parameters and their combinations. With the standards provided, mPGAS values can now be tested to see if detection of different types of third trimester growth problems is improved.

摘要

目的

为单一和综合生物测量参数定义改良的产前生长评估分数(mPGAS),并确定其在正常胎儿中的参考范围。

方法

在一项对119例新生儿生长结局正常的胎儿进行的纵向研究中,测量了9个解剖参数(ap)并估计了体重(EWTa、EWTb)。从孕中期Rossavik尺寸模型获得的预期孕晚期尺寸轨迹用于计算每个胎儿的百分比偏差(%Dev's)及其特定年龄的参考范围。将个体%Dev's值超出其参考范围的组成部分,指定为+iapPGAS、-iapPGAS,进行平均,得出孕晚期的+apPGAS和-apPGAS值。然后将不同ap组合(c1a(头围(HC)、腹围(AC)、股骨长度(FDL)、胸廓周长(ThC)、EWTa)、c1b(HC、AC、FDL、ThC、EWTb)、c2(ThC、臂围(ArmC)、羊水体积(AVol)、胎儿体积(TVol))、c3(HC、AC、FDL、EWTa))的+iapPGAS和-iapPGAS值进行平均,得出不同时间点或孕晚期结束时的+icPGAS和-icPGAS值(+cPGAS、-cPGAS)。将iapPGAS、ic1bPGAS和ic2PGAS的值与其各自的apPGAS或cPGAS参考范围进行比较。

结果

所有mPGAS值的一个95%范围边界为0.0%。1D +apPGAS值的上限范围从0.0%(HC)到+0.49%(ThC),而EWT、AVol和TVol的上限分别为+0.06%、+2.3%和+1.8%。-apPGAS的可比数值为0.0%(双顶径(BPD)、FDL、头臀长度(HDL))到-0.58%(ArmC)、-0.13%(EWT)、-0.8%(AVol)和0.0%(TVol)。+cPGAS的95%参考范围上限从+0.36%(c1b)到+0.89%(c2)不等。-cPGAS下限的可比数值为-0.17%(c1b)到-0.43%(c2)。

结论

最初的PGAS概念现已扩展到个体生物测量参数及其组合。有了所提供的标准,现在可以测试mPGAS值,以查看是否能改善对不同类型孕晚期生长问题的检测。

相似文献

1
A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 May;28(7):745-54. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.934218. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
2
Individualized fetal growth assessment: critical evaluation of key concepts in the specification of third trimester size trajectories.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Apr;27(6):543-51. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.833904. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
3
Comparison of fetal size standards obtained with conventional methods and individualized assessment: the effect of adjusting for differences in growth potential.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Sep;33(18):3170-3176. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1601695. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
Individualized growth assessment of fetal thigh circumference using three-dimensional ultrasonography.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;31(5):520-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.5302.
5
Individualized growth assessment of fetal soft tissue using fractional thigh volume.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Dec;24(7):766-74. doi: 10.1002/uog.1779.
7
Prenatal prediction of neonatal growth status in twins using individualized growth assessment.
J Clin Ultrasound. 1996 Feb;24(2):53-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199602)24:2<53::AID-JCU1>3.0.CO;2-J.
8
Fetal growth cessation in late pregnancy: its impact on predicted size parameters used to classify small for gestational age neonates.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 May;28(7):755-65. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.934219. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
9
Second trimester growth velocities: assessment of fetal growth potential in SGA singletons.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(6):939-946. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1395849. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
10
Third trimester growth restriction patterns: individualized assessment using a fetal growth pathology score.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Aug;31(16):2155-2163. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1337741. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound parameters of arteries and heart in normal fetuses.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2024 Jul 29;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12947-024-00328-w.
3
Second trimester growth velocities: assessment of fetal growth potential in SGA singletons.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Mar;32(6):939-946. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1395849. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
4
Fractional fetal thigh volume in the prediction of normal and abnormal fetal growth during the third trimester of pregnancy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):453.e1-453.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
5
Third trimester growth restriction patterns: individualized assessment using a fetal growth pathology score.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Aug;31(16):2155-2163. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1337741. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
6
Fetal growth pathology score: a novel ultrasound parameter for individualized assessment of third trimester growth abnormalities.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Apr;31(7):866-876. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1300646. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

2
The role of growth trajectories in classifying fetal growth restriction.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):248-254. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829ca9a7.
4
Individualized fetal growth assessment: critical evaluation of key concepts in the specification of third trimester size trajectories.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Apr;27(6):543-51. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.833904. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
5
Ultrasound methodology used to construct the fetal growth standards in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120 Suppl 2:27-32, v. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12313. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
6
The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
BJOG. 2013 Sep;120 Suppl 2:9-26, v. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12047. Epub 2013 May 17.
7
8
Combined sonographic testing index and prediction of adverse outcome in preterm fetal growth restriction.
Am J Perinatol. 2014 Feb;31(2):139-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1341574. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
9
Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;208(4):290.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.007.
10
Sonographic accuracy of estimated fetal weight in twins.
J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Apr;32(4):625-30. doi: 10.7863/jum.2013.32.4.625.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验