Suppr超能文献

肥胖症手术认证的影响。

Impact of accreditation in bariatric surgery.

作者信息

Gebhart Alana, Young Monica, Phelan Michael, Nguyen Ninh T

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California.

Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, California.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Sep-Oct;10(5):767-73. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown improved outcomes associated with accredited bariatric centers. The aim of our study was to examine the outcomes of bariatric surgery performed at accredited versus nonaccredited centers using a nationally representative database. Additionally, we aimed to determine if the presence of bariatric surgery accreditation could lead to improved outcomes for morbidly obese patients undergoing other general laparoscopic operations.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, for data between 2008 and 2010, clinical data of morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery, laparoscopic antireflux surgery, cholecystectomy, and colectomy were analyzed according to the hospital's bariatric accreditation status.

RESULTS

A total of 277,068 bariatric operations were performed during the 3-year period, with 88.4% of cases performed at accredited centers. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower at accredited compared to nonaccredited centers (.08% versus .19%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that nonaccredited centers had higher risk-adjusted mortality for bariatric procedures compared to accredited centers (odds ratio [OR] 3.1, P<.01). Post hoc analysis showed improved mortality for patients who underwent gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy at accredited centers compared to nonaccredited centers (.09% versus .27%, respectively, P<.01). Patients with a high severity of illness who underwent bariatric surgery also had lower mortality rates when the surgery was performed at accredited versus nonaccredited centers (.17% versus .45%, respectively, P<.01). Multivariate analysis showed that morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (OR 2.4, P<.05) and antireflux surgery (OR 2.03, P<.01) at nonaccredited centers had higher rates of serious complications.

CONCLUSION

Accreditation in bariatric surgery was associated with more than a 3-fold reduction in risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. Resources established for bariatric surgery accreditation may have the secondary benefit of improving outcomes for morbidly obese patients undergoing general laparoscopic operations.

摘要

背景

多项研究表明,经认证的减肥中心与更好的治疗结果相关。我们研究的目的是使用具有全国代表性的数据库,比较经认证和未经认证的中心进行减肥手术的结果。此外,我们旨在确定减肥手术认证是否能改善接受其他普通腹腔镜手术的病态肥胖患者的治疗结果。

方法

利用全国住院患者样本数据库,分析2008年至2010年间接受减肥手术、腹腔镜抗反流手术、胆囊切除术和结肠切除术的病态肥胖患者的临床数据,并根据医院的减肥认证状态进行分析。

结果

在这3年期间共进行了277,068例减肥手术,其中88.4%的病例在经认证的中心进行。与未经认证的中心相比,经认证的中心住院死亡率显著更低(分别为0.08%和0.19%)。多变量分析显示,与经认证的中心相比,未经认证的中心减肥手术的风险调整死亡率更高(比值比[OR]为3.1,P<0.01)。事后分析显示,与未经认证的中心相比,在经认证的中心接受胃旁路手术和袖状胃切除术的患者死亡率有所改善(分别为0.09%和0.27%,P<0.01)。病情严重的减肥手术患者在经认证的中心接受手术时死亡率也更低(分别为0.17%和0.45%,P<0.01)。多变量分析显示,在未经认证的中心接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术(OR为2.4,P<0.05)和抗反流手术(OR为2.03,P<0.01)的病态肥胖患者严重并发症发生率更高。

结论

减肥手术认证与风险调整后的住院死亡率降低超过3倍相关。为减肥手术认证设立的资源可能对改善接受普通腹腔镜手术的病态肥胖患者的治疗结果有额外益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验