Liu Yuewei, Rong Yi, Steenland Kyle, Christiani David C, Huang Xiji, Wu Tangchun, Chen Weihong
From the aKey Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education & Ministry of Environmental Protection, and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health (Incubating), Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei,China; bInstitute of Health Surveillance, Analysis and Protection, Hubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China; cDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; and dDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Epidemiology. 2014 Sep;25(5):689-96. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000143.
The association between crystalline silica exposure and risk of heart disease mortality remains less clear.
We investigated a cohort of 42,572 Chinese workers who were potentially exposed to crystalline silica and followed from 1960 to 2003. Cumulative silica exposure was estimated by linking a job-exposure matrix to each person's work history. Low-level silica exposure was defined as never having held a job with an exposure higher than 0.1 mg/m. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) in exposure-response analyses using Cox proportional hazards model.
We identified 2846 deaths from heart disease during an average of 35 years follow-up. Positive exposure-response trends were observed for cumulative silica exposure associated with mortality from total heart disease (HRs for increasing quartiles of cumulative silica exposure compared with the unexposed group = 0.89, 1.09, 1.32, 2.10; P for linear trend < 0.001) and pulmonary heart disease (0.92, 1.39, 2.47, 5.46; P for linear trend < 0.001). These positive trends remained among workers with both high- and low-level silica exposure. There was also a positive trend for ischemic heart disease among workers with low-level exposure, with quartile HRs of 1.04, 1.13, 1.52, and 1.60 (P for linear trend < 0.001).
Low-level crystalline silica exposure was associated with increased mortality from heart disease, including pulmonary heart disease and ischemic heart disease, whereas high-level exposure mainly increased mortality from pulmonary heart disease. Current permissible exposure limits for crystalline silica in many countries may be insufficient to protect people from deaths due to heart disease.
结晶硅石暴露与心脏病死亡率之间的关联仍不太明确。
我们调查了42572名有潜在结晶硅石暴露风险的中国工人队列,随访时间从1960年至2003年。通过将工作暴露矩阵与每个人的工作史相联系来估算累积硅石暴露量。低水平硅石暴露定义为从未从事过暴露水平高于0.1毫克/立方米的工作。在暴露-反应分析中,我们使用Cox比例风险模型估算风险比(HRs)。
在平均35年的随访期间,我们确定了2846例心脏病死亡病例。观察到累积硅石暴露与总心脏病死亡率之间呈正暴露-反应趋势(与未暴露组相比,累积硅石暴露四分位数增加的HRs分别为0.89、1.09、1.32、2.10;线性趋势P<0.001)以及与肺心病死亡率之间呈正暴露-反应趋势(0.92、1.39、2.47、5.46;线性趋势P<0.001)。这些正趋势在高、低水平硅石暴露的工人中均存在。在低水平暴露的工人中,缺血性心脏病也呈正趋势,四分位数HRs分别为1.04、1.13、1.52和1.60(线性趋势P<0.001)。
低水平结晶硅石暴露与包括肺心病和缺血性心脏病在内的心脏病死亡率增加相关,而高水平暴露主要增加肺心病死亡率。许多国家目前的结晶硅石允许暴露限值可能不足以保护人们免于因心脏病死亡。