Valadez Joseph J, Devkota Baburam, Pradhan Madan Mohan, Meherda Pramod, Sonal G S, Dhariwal Akshay, Davis Rosemary
METRe Group, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Oct;19(10):1226-36. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12354. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
This paper reports the first trial of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) assessing associations between access to LQAS data and subsequent improvements in district programming. This trial concerns India's approach to addressing an increase in malaria-attributable deaths by training community health workers to diagnose, treat and prevent malaria, while using LQAS to monitor sub-district performance and make programme improvements.
The Ministry of Health introduced LQAS into four matched high malaria burden districts (Annual Parasite Incidence >5) (N > 5 million). In each sub-district, we sampled four populations in three 6-monthly surveys: households, children <5 years, people with fever in the last 2 weeks and community health workers. In three districts, trained local staff collected, analysed and used data for programme management; in one control district, non-local staff collected data and did not disseminate results. For eight indicators, we calculated the change in proportion from survey one to three and used a Difference-in-Differences test to compare the relative change between intervention and control districts.
Coverage increased from survey one to three for 24 of 32 comparisons. Difference-in-Differences tests revealed that intervention districts exhibited significantly greater change in four of six vertical strategies (insecticide treated bed-nets and indoor residual spraying), one of six treatment-seeking behaviours and four of 12 health worker capacity indicators. The control district displayed greater improvement than two intervention districts for one health worker capacity indicator. One district with poor management did not improve.
In this study, LQAS results appeared to support district managers to increase coverage in underperforming areas, especially for vertical strategies in the presence of diligent managers.
本文报告了首次采用批质量保证抽样法(LQAS)评估获取LQAS数据与地区规划后续改进之间关联的试验。该试验涉及印度应对疟疾所致死亡人数增加的方法,即培训社区卫生工作者诊断、治疗和预防疟疾,同时使用LQAS监测分区绩效并改进规划。
卫生部将LQAS引入四个匹配的高疟疾负担地区(年寄生虫发病率>5)(人口>500万)。在每个分区,我们在三次为期6个月的调查中对四类人群进行抽样:家庭、5岁以下儿童、过去两周内发烧的人以及社区卫生工作者。在三个地区,训练有素的当地工作人员收集、分析并使用数据进行规划管理;在一个对照地区,非当地工作人员收集数据但不公布结果。对于八项指标,我们计算了从第一次调查到第三次调查的比例变化,并使用双重差分检验来比较干预地区和对照地区之间的相对变化。
在32项比较中,有24项从第一次调查到第三次调查的覆盖率有所提高。双重差分检验显示,在六项垂直策略(经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐和室内滞留喷洒)中的四项、六项寻求治疗行为中的一项以及12项卫生工作者能力指标中的四项方面,干预地区的变化显著更大。在一项卫生工作者能力指标上,对照地区的改善比两个干预地区更大。一个管理不善的地区没有改善。
在本研究中,LQAS结果似乎支持地区管理人员提高表现不佳地区的覆盖率,特别是在有勤奋管理人员的情况下提高垂直策略的覆盖率。