Suppr超能文献

人体肌肉蛋白质分数合成率的测定:不同质谱技术的评估及示踪剂选择的考量

Determination of human muscle protein fractional synthesis rate: an evaluation of different mass spectrometry techniques and considerations for tracer choice.

作者信息

Bornø Andreas, Hulston Carl J, van Hall Gerrit

机构信息

Rigshospitalet, Clinical Metabolomics Core Facility (CMCF), Section 7652, Ole Maaløesvej 26, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.

出版信息

J Mass Spectrom. 2014 Aug;49(8):674-80. doi: 10.1002/jms.3387.

Abstract

In the present study, different MS methods for the determination of human muscle protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) using [ring-(13)C6 ]phenylalanine as a tracer were evaluated. Because the turnover rate of human skeletal muscle is slow, only minute quantities of the stable isotopically labeled amino acid will be incorporated within the few hours of a typical laboratory experiment. GC combustion isotope ratio MS (GC-C-IRMS) has thus far been considered the 'gold' standard for the precise measurements of these low enrichment levels. However, advances in liquid chromatography-tandem MS (LC-MS/MS) and GC-tandem MS (GC-MS/MS) have made these techniques an option for human muscle FSR measurements. Human muscle biopsies were freeze dried, cleaned, and hydrolyzed, and the amino acids derivatized using either N-acetyl-n-propyl, phenylisothiocyanate, or N-methyl-N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA) for GC-C-IRMS, LC-MS/MS, and GC-MS/MS analysis, respectively. A second derivative, heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA), was also used for GC-MS/MS analysis as an alternative for MTBSTFA. The machine reproducibility or the coefficients of variation for delta tracer-tracee-ratio measurements (delta tracer-tracee-ratio values around 0.0002) were 2.6%, 4.1%, and 10.9% for GC-C-IRMS, LC-MS/MS, and GC-MS/MS (MTBSTFA), respectively. FSR determined with LC-MS/MS compared well with GC-C-IRMS and so did the GC-MS/MS when using the HFBA derivative (linear fit Y = 1.08 ± 0.10, X + 0.0049 ± 0.0061, r = 0.89 ± 0.01, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, (1) IRMS still offers the most precise measurement of human muscle FSR, (2) LC-MS/MS comes quite close and is a good alternative when tissue quantities are too small for GC-C-IRMS, and (3) If GC-MS/MS is to be used, then the HFBA derivative should be used instead of MTBSTFA, which gave unacceptably high variability.

摘要

在本研究中,评估了使用[环-(13)C6]苯丙氨酸作为示踪剂测定人体肌肉蛋白质分数合成率(FSR)的不同质谱方法。由于人体骨骼肌的周转率较慢,在典型的实验室实验的几个小时内,只有微量的稳定同位素标记氨基酸会被掺入。到目前为止,气相色谱-燃烧-同位素比率质谱法(GC-C-IRMS)一直被认为是精确测量这些低富集水平的“黄金”标准。然而,液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)和气相色谱-串联质谱法(GC-MS/MS)的进展使这些技术成为测量人体肌肉FSR的一种选择。人体肌肉活检组织经冷冻干燥、清理和水解,氨基酸分别使用N-乙酰-n-丙基、苯异硫氰酸酯或N-甲基-N-(叔丁基二甲基硅烷基)三氟乙酰胺(MTBSTFA)进行衍生化,用于GC-C-IRMS、LC-MS/MS和GC-MS/MS分析。还使用了第二种衍生物七氟丁酸(HFBA)作为MTBSTFA的替代品用于GC-MS/MS分析。对于δ示踪剂-被示踪物比率测量(δ示踪剂-被示踪物比率值约为0.0002),GC-C-IRMS、LC-MS/MS和GC-MS/MS(MTBSTFA)的仪器重现性或变异系数分别为2.6%、4.1%和10.9%。用LC-MS/MS测定的FSR与GC-C-IRMS相比良好,使用HFBA衍生物时GC-MS/MS测定的FSR也是如此(线性拟合Y = 1.08 ± 0.10,X + 0.0049 ± 0.0061,r = 0.89 ± 0.01,P < 0.0001)。总之,(1)IRMS仍然提供人体肌肉FSR的最精确测量,(2)当组织量对于GC-C-IRMS来说太小时,LC-MS/MS非常接近且是一个很好的替代方法,(3)如果要使用GC-MS/MS,那么应该使用HFBA衍生物而不是MTBSTFA,MTBSTFA产生的变异性高得令人无法接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验