O'Leary Jacqueline G, Michelle Shiller S, Bellamy Christopher, Nalesnik Michael A, Kaneku Hugo, Jennings Linda W, Isse Kumiko, Terasaki Paul I, Klintmalm Göran B, Demetris Anthony J
Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Liver Transpl. 2014 Oct;20(10):1244-55. doi: 10.1002/lt.23948.
Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurs in a small minority of sensitized liver transplant recipients. Although histopathological characteristics have been described, specific features that could be used (1) to make a generalizable scoring system and (2) to trigger a more in-depth analysis are needed to screen for this rare but important finding. Toward this goal, we created training and validation cohorts of putative acute AMR and control cases from 3 high-volume liver transplant programs; these cases were evaluated blindly by 4 independent transplant pathologists. Evaluations of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections were performed alone without knowledge of either serum donor-specific human leukocyte antigen alloantibody (DSA) results or complement component 4d (C4d) stains. Routine histopathological features that strongly correlated with severe acute AMR included portal eosinophilia, portal vein endothelial cell hypertrophy, eosinophilic central venulitis, central venulitis severity, and cholestasis. Acute AMR inversely correlated with lymphocytic venulitis and lymphocytic portal inflammation. These and other characteristics were incorporated into models created from the training cohort alone. The final acute antibody-mediated rejection score (aAMR score)--the sum of portal vein endothelial cell hypertrophy, portal eosinophilia, and eosinophilic venulitis divided by the sum of lymphocytic portal inflammation and lymphocytic venulitis--exhibited a strong correlation with severe acute AMR in the training cohort [odds ratio (OR) = 2.86, P < 0.001] and the validation cohort (OR = 2.49, P < 0.001). SPSS tree classification was used to select 2 cutoffs: one that optimized specificity at a score > 1.75 (sensitivity = 34%, specificity = 86%) and another that optimized sensitivity at a score > 1.0 (sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 71%). In conclusion, the routine histopathological features of the aAMR score can be used to screen patients for acute AMR via routine H&E staining of indication liver transplant biopsy samples; however, a definitive diagnosis requires substantiation by DSA testing, diffuse C4d staining, and the exclusion of other insults.
急性抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)在少数致敏肝移植受者中发生。尽管已经描述了其组织病理学特征,但仍需要特定特征用于(1)建立通用评分系统以及(2)引发更深入分析,以筛查这种罕见但重要的发现。为实现这一目标,我们从3个高容量肝移植项目中创建了疑似急性AMR和对照病例的训练队列与验证队列;这些病例由4名独立的移植病理学家进行盲法评估。在不了解血清供体特异性人类白细胞抗原同种抗体(DSA)结果或补体成分4d(C4d)染色的情况下,单独对苏木精和伊红(H&E)切片进行评估。与严重急性AMR密切相关的常规组织病理学特征包括门管区嗜酸性粒细胞增多、门静脉内皮细胞肥大、嗜酸性中央静脉炎、中央静脉炎严重程度以及胆汁淤积。急性AMR与淋巴细胞性静脉炎和淋巴细胞性门管区炎症呈负相关。这些及其他特征仅纳入由训练队列创建的模型中。最终的急性抗体介导的排斥反应评分(aAMR评分)——门静脉内皮细胞肥大、门管区嗜酸性粒细胞增多和嗜酸性静脉炎的总和除以淋巴细胞性门管区炎症和淋巴细胞性静脉炎的总和——在训练队列中与严重急性AMR呈现出强相关性[比值比(OR)=2.86,P<0.001],在验证队列中也是如此(OR=2.49,P<0.001)。使用SPSS树状分类法选择2个临界值:一个在评分>1.75时优化特异性(敏感性=34%,特异性=86%),另一个在评分>1.0时优化敏感性(敏感性=81%,特异性=71%)。总之,aAMR评分的常规组织病理学特征可用于通过对指示性肝移植活检样本进行常规H&E染色来筛查急性AMR患者;然而,明确诊断需要DSA检测、弥漫性C4d染色并排除其他损伤来证实。