Lee Sung-Jae, Newman Peter A, Duan Naihua, Cunningham William E
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA Semel Institute, Center for Community Health, University of California, 10920 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 350, Los Angeles, CA 90024-6521, USA.
Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor Street West, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1V4.
Vaccine. 2014 Sep 3;32(39):5013-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.018. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
Decade-long delays in successful implementation of Hepatitis B vaccines and ongoing obstacles in HPV vaccine roll-out suggest the importance of an implementation science approach to prepare for the effective translation of future HIV vaccines from clinical trials into routine practice. The objective of this study was to test HIV vaccine attitude items to develop reliable scales and to examine their association with HIV vaccine acceptability.
HIV vaccine attitude items were assessed as part of the L.A. VOICES survey, a large-scale study conducted among underserved residents of Los Angeles, to identify factors that may influence HIV vaccine acceptability. Participants (n=1225) were randomly selected from public STD clinics, needle exchange sites and Latino community clinics using three-stage, venue-based time space sampling.
Exploratory factor analysis across 20 items revealed four distinct factors - mistrust, HIV vaccine social concerns, risk compensation, and altruistic vaccination - with acceptable reliability coefficients for each subscale (Cronbach's α range 0.61-0.84). We found no significant differences in reliability by gender or by vaccine acceptability. Risk compensation (odds ratio (OR)=1.49; 95% CI=[1.18, 1.89]; p=0.001) and altruistic vaccination (OR=1.40; 95% CI=[1.14, 1.71]; p=0.001) were significantly and positively associated with HIV vaccine acceptability.
We identified four HIV vaccine attitude scales with sound internal reliability parameters. In the aftermath of the first candidate vaccine to demonstrate efficacy against HIV infection, these scales may be helpful in bridging expectable research-to-practice gaps in future HIV vaccine dissemination among populations at risk. As HIV vaccine trials progress in the United States and globally, these measures also may be useful as a tool to assess and facilitate effective responses to community concerns about HIV vaccine trials and to target interventions to support recruitment and mitigate risk compensation.
乙肝疫苗成功推广历经十年延迟,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗的推广也持续面临阻碍,这表明采用实施科学方法对于为未来HIV疫苗从临床试验有效转化为常规实践做好准备至关重要。本研究的目的是测试HIV疫苗态度项目,以制定可靠的量表,并检验它们与HIV疫苗可接受性的关联。
作为洛杉矶之声调查的一部分,对HIV疫苗态度项目进行了评估,该调查是在洛杉矶服务不足的居民中开展的一项大规模研究,旨在确定可能影响HIV疫苗可接受性的因素。参与者(n = 1225)使用基于场所的三阶段时空抽样方法,从公共性传播疾病诊所、针头交换点和拉丁裔社区诊所中随机选取。
对20个项目进行探索性因素分析,发现了四个不同的因素——不信任、HIV疫苗社会担忧、风险补偿和利他性接种——每个子量表的可靠性系数均可接受(克朗巴哈系数α范围为0.61 - 0.84)。我们发现,按性别或疫苗可接受性划分,可靠性无显著差异。风险补偿(优势比(OR)= 1.49;95%置信区间=[1.18, 1.89];p = 0.001)和利他性接种(OR = 1.40;95%置信区间=[1.14, 1.71];p = 0.001)与HIV疫苗可接受性显著正相关。
我们确定了四个具有良好内部可靠性参数的HIV疫苗态度量表。在首个显示出抗HIV感染疗效的候选疫苗出现之后,这些量表可能有助于弥合未来HIV疫苗在高危人群中传播时预期的研究与实践之间的差距。随着美国和全球范围内HIV疫苗试验的推进,这些措施也可能作为一种工具,用于评估和促进对社区对HIV疫苗试验的担忧做出有效回应,并针对干预措施以支持招募和减轻风险补偿。